Talk:No-code esolang

This concept is incoherent. Corbin (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Why? --None1 (Nope.) 11:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Because a language is definitionally a set of sentences encoded in some alphabet. An interpreter which only accepts the empty language is equivalent to a machine which has no input at all, and study of that machine has nothing to do with programming languages. The fact that there are zero examples in the article and no outgoing links suggests that it can't be instantiated. Incoming links are very weak and themselves incoherent; for example, does Brainfucking take input or not?

Note that, in general, I want joke concepts to either be categorized or deleted. I don't care which. Corbin (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2025 (UTC)