Talk:Pxem

From Esolang
Jump to: navigation, search
  • Some parts of Pxem is very ambiguous and we need to make clarified and extended version.
    • Original one used not to tell from uppercases and lowercases when it is next to dots, but we must tell them clearly.
    • .p, .o, .n are too ambiguous because it isn't shown whether it should output newlines or shouldn't. What about this: lowercase ones do while uppercase ones don't.
    • We are not really sure what to do if your stack has only an element while getting conditional commands which requires two elements.
      • Should we get to corresponding .a or not?
      • Must we throw the only remaining element away?

(Above comment originally by User:YamTokWae on 08:38, 18 September 2018 on List of ideas, moved here by – b_jonas 18:16, 18 September 2018 (UTC))

Announcement:I'm fixing the article.

Due to having found that Pxem#Specifications has some incorrect informations, I'm fixing. When done, I'm announcing so.--YamTokTpaFa (talk) 09:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Now it's almost fixed! --YamTokTpaFa (talk) 14:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)