Talk:RaiseAfloppaFan's Stupid Idea 0

Float or no float?

Can the pointer float on nothing, like empty spaces are NOPs, or do you have to always be on a command? Esolangist (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Good point, I didn't really think of that. I guess the pointer should always be on a command and empty spaces stop the program. (talk)(User:RaiseAfloppaFan3925)---- 14:48, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

I added a command that toggles Float Mode. Float Mode off is normal code, but Float Mode on lets the instruction pointer float on empty spaces. Esolangist (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Example!

With Float off...

. Is the pointer btw

.>>

>.>

>>.

>>> (Pointer fell off.)

And Float on.

.>F

>.F

>>.

>>F.

>>F .

etc.

Turing-complete?

Alright, let's find out if this is Turing-Complete.I

Brain**** comparison?

+w = +

-w = -

←→ = <>

What about ,.?

., = ., (obviously.)

We need loops. [] is non-zero...

•` And ¢¥ are [].

So...

We can turn BF into RSI0, meaning...

RSI0 IS TURING COMPLETE!

Esolangist (talk) 18:21, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Woah, I was not expecting that AT ALL. Also about the loops, =[ and ]= do exist, the only problem being they loop unless the cell is equal to 2,763 and not zero. But still, this is a cause for celebration. (talk)(User:RaiseAfloppaFan3925)---- 18:27, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

[raiseAfloppaFan3925, sorry I forgot to sign] (talk)(User:RaiseAfloppaFan3925)---- 20:15, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Now I'll try to translate this to BF.

+ and - are just + and x

, and . are the same

< and > are ← and →

[ and can be emulated with ` like this

BF
+[.+]

RSI0
{
  {v    }
  {+    }
  {r>   }
  {>>.+v}
  { `  X}
  { ^XX<}
}

Here's another one

BF
[-]

RSI0
{
  {>`>-v }
  { ^XX< }
}

Joke thread

when will RSI1 release Esolangist alt (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

I guess when I get a new idea or decide to shamelessly steal Befunge-98 or brain explosion (talk)(User:RaiseAfloppaFan3925)---- 20:38, 1 November 2025 (UTC)