We are currently working on new rules for what content should and shouldn't be allowed on this website, and are looking for feedback! See Esolang:2026 topicality proposal to view and give feedback on the current draft.

User:RaiseAfloppaFan3925

From Esolang
Jump to navigation Jump to search
My preferred username is raiseafloppafan3925 however because of the User: prefix, I prefer RaiseAfloppaFan3925. Although I still prefer raiseafloppafan3925

Codeberg | GitHub | Scratch | Sandbox

▼(°v°)▼ ▼(^v^)▼ 3.1415926535897932... ▼(^v^)▼ ▼(°v°)▼

RE-ADD KASANE AND SKILSAW AND VOID WALKERS AND SIEGE

Time: 00:03 (reload to see the time?) RaiseAfloppaFan3925 【mag-usap tayo (talk)・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼】

Why not join us on IRC?

Warfront on woomy.app would have absolutely been a hit

my esolangs

golden era (2024)

flop era (2025-2026)

renaissance II (2026)

  • 🍡Dango - Now Turing-complete. Isn't it wonderful?

mesmerizer (2026)

There are language families now.

???

  • Some language

The Double free family

The Double free family is a language family based on Double free, which itself is based on Malloc. 

       C
       |
 +-----+-----+
 |           |
C++          |
 |     Malloc (None1)
 |           |
 +-----+-----+
       |
  Double free
       |
       +----------------+
       |                |
Mixed allocators        |
                  Use-after-free

Conway's game of life is mesmerizing

esolang of the time period

Time period Esolangs Reason
20 August 2026 – present Funge-98 "LF" (Line Feed, newline) is actually Да
20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 Befunge-93 It's (obviously) very cool
12 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 Conway's Game of Life and Double free The reason is obvious
26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026 Lambda calculus with named variables Obtw why MathML not work at all? It just shows as dollar sign. (λx.x x)(λx.x x) or I guess in better form, SII(SII).
18 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 pythOwO and Permission denied very obvious (see history of Permission denied)
14 June 2026 – 18 July 2026 pythOwO and Bussin (X) i like pythowo and i severely disrespected Bussin (X) when I made the page lol
4 April 2026 – 14 June 2026 pythOwO i like pythowo
26 May 2026 – 4 April 2026 LOLCODE i like lolcode
22 May 2026 – 26 May 2026 pythOwO i love pythowo

sino ba ako

i like raise a floppa and i loved playing it while it was popular (why do you think is my username "raiseafloppafan")

I mostly only edit my user page.

If it wasn't obvious by now, I like Undertale OST 054 - Hotel (and vocaloid)

news?

Some strange questions and thoughts and ideas

  • Is it best to have your personal stuff before the languages or after?
  • C is technically self-modifying since you can make a byte array of instructions (and depending on your platform, change the memory protection of that region to allow executing) then call it using a function pointer. This also means that C++ is self-modifying, and that Rust is self-modifying. This also makes C3 self-modifying.
    • Adding onto this idea, what if you linked a C compiler to your program (say, TinyCC or chibicc) and made an eval function? Then, you could just write this.
#include "raiseafloppafan7741/crt.h"

static const char* program =
"#include <stdio.h>\n"
"void proc_main(){puts(\"Hello, world!\");}";

int main() {
    rcrt_code_t code;
    if (!rcrt_compile(&code, program)) return 1;
    void (*proc_main)() = rcrt_find_proc(&code, "proc_main");
    proc_main();
    rcrt_release_code(&code);
    return 0;
}
  • With the above knowledge in mind, you can maybe make an actual C shell that actually uses C instead of a C imitation!
    • If it works with C# and Roslyn in Unity, it should work for C with a C compiler like chibicc or TinyCC.
  • What exactly makes a language esoteric? If I just make a verbose, COBOL-looking (Common Business Oriented Language, not the COBOL we have here) language, then is that esoteric? And if it is esoteric, then wouldn't that make COBOL esoteric by modern standards? Same with SOL? Maybe esoteric just means not mainstream and very unusual, so COBOL isn't that esoteric compared to GolfScript but is in the same place as LOLCODE?
    • Maybe esoteric-ness also involves the intent of the creator of the language? COBOL is esoteric by modern standards, however back then it was intended for seious business use. COBOL is not considered esoteric despite being strange, so maybe that's that. Also, COBOL is not that esoteric anyway since it has normal data types and stuff, just very strange because it was made in the 50s for businessmen rather than programmers.
  • A language that ragebaits you.
  • What if we tried to use a Markov text generator to generate code? Can even run on a cheap microcontroller!
    • What if there was a programming language optimized for being learned by Markov text generators?
  • If the wiki were to gain a style guide or manual, what would it look like and what if a page doesn't follow it?
  • What if we had an operating system (or a kernel, like Linux or GNU Hurd) that's usable like a normal one (Windows, Linux distros, macOS, RedoxOS, Multics, UNIX, Darwin, TempleOS, ZealOS, etc.) but it's written in esolangs? For example, some numeric computation parts could be written in brainfuck, the assembler-needing parts could use hex1/hex2, and everything else uses variants of INTERCAL, LOLCODE, Piet, and Whitespace designed for bare-metal programming? Also, the parts that cannot be written in esolangs (hex1/hex2 would probably cover them, but) we can just use normal C.
    • The problem is we would need an established ABI for INTERCAL and LOLCODE, plus a compiler for brainfuck and Piet that can generate non-standalone code. Then, we'd need an esolang compiler collection with a unified ABI and dedicated language dialects, since INTERCAL is kinda high-level and LOLCODE was not at all intended for bare metal.
    • Would be pretty cool though.
  • INTERCAL should really have a compiler written in INTERCAL.
  • Adding onto the question of esoteric-ness earlier, what if a language that "isn't esoteric enough" is added to the wiki? Not going to name examples but this has happened thrice to my knowledge. If they are not esoteric at all is obvious, but what if it's kinda esoteric? Like a COBOL-like language?
  • What if we make a compiler collection for esolangs, then we use the esolangs to write the compiler collection? For example, we could have a brainfuck, LOLCODE and INTERCAL compiler, and rewrite the meat of it in INTERCAL and LOLCODE, and use brainfuck for some of the numeric stuff.
    • Adding onto this, some languages can't be compiled and so must be interpreted. (or you can just make an interpreter and the compiler is a bundler, I think I've said this already here) So what do we do about those? (make. a. bundler. like. pyinstaller or something.)
    • Would it be better for the "compiler collection" to use a shared backend like LLVM or how the GNU compilers (C, C++, Ada, Go, Rust, Objective-C, Fortran, Forth, etc.) all target the same IR?
      • I suppose if an IR were to be used, it'd have to be very general-purpose since some languages (cough cough cough cough) can't be compiled "normally" and would require a runtime, so something like LLVM IR would be good.
  • If the Esolang:2026 topicality proposal takes too long, will it be renamed to Esolang:2026-2027 topicality proposal?
  • What if we made compilers for LOLCODE and INTERCAL? We could have dialects of LOLCODE and INTERCAL (or C-INTERCAL, CLC-INTERCAL, or CLCLC-INTERCAL) with FFI functionality so we could have library bindings for them!
    • I know that LOLCODE has that ability, but it's an interpreter. I would like to be able to write an operating system kernel in LOLCODE.
  • What if we use LOLCODE's lollm for an IRC bot in #esolangs?
    • What would be the name though, and what would be the training data?
  • Is there anyone who has been actively working on an esolang compiler collection? If so, how's it going? Something I'd like to ask is, is it more of a collection of different separate esolang compilers or is it like GCC where they are all unified?
  • What would actually happen if you somehow did eat 562 metric tons of air? Obviously you probably wouldn't start floating up into the sky like that, but I still wonder what would happen. (other than the obvious "you die")
  • Thue is on track to be the featured language for 8-9 years.
  • An INTERCAL compiler written in INTERCAL.
  • A LOLCODE compiler written in LOLCODE, with a C runtime to bring it to the same level as interpreted LOLCODE.
  • A compiler that can handle trivial substitutions. (pretty trivial)
    • It is absolutely NOT trivial to do that

Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data.

You might have been logged out. Please verify that you're still logged in and try again. If it still does not work, try logging out and logging back in, and check that your browser allows cookies from this site.

  • This thing.
    • Hmm, that's not exactly a bad idea. (no not the logging out part or the loss of session data part those are disgusting)
  • What if we had a programming language that is like a natural language? There would be two ways to go about this.
    • You could probably have a structured subset of a natural language, and allow for input in other languages. For example, if you had a "print" statement in English, it could be "mag-print" or "sabihin ang" in Filipino/Tagalog and the interpreter would accept both. Maybe you could even mix different languages in one program! Mixing two in the same sentence, however...
    • Or, you could make a constructed language that could be spoken like a natural language, but is mainly designed to be parsed. Although, you'd need a highly structured and unambiguous conlang in order to be able to make this work. Also, it'd have to be oriented for programming and not for everyday speech.
  • Doesn't matter what programming language you use, because at the end of the day it's night. (unless you live in Antarctica or close to the North Pole)
  • Beefydie already exists. But why stop there?
  • An esoteric operating system would be cool.
  • Would it really be better to have a monolithic esolang interpreter/compiler, or have several separate ones?
  • Whitespace
  • An esolang based on...
  • C++'s template system has been proven Turing-complete. So why not make a compact representation for them that looks utterly disgusting?
  • Speaking of operating systems, how about one that uses length-prefixed strings? The problem is widening the bit width however, but null-terminated strings suck nowadays since the null byte is a real ASCII (and Unicode) character and is present in your average binary file.
  • Language based on user signatures on the wiki? raiseafloppafan7741 【mag-usap tayo (talk)・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼】 16:33, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
  • WHAT in the name of pythOwO is Witcher Script?!

observation about page size

The gap between Minim and the second largest page, SELECT./Hello World, is around 7,000 bytes. Then the gap between that (SELECT./Hello World) and the third largest page, PRINT/Concept Interpreter, is around 70,000 to 80,000 bytes. Then the first page below 100,000 bytes is BunnyBell at place 14, with the first below 75,000 being UserEdited in 23rd place. First one below 50,000 is Siterip at 44th place, and the first one below 25,000 being Computable at 157th place. First one below 10,000 bytes is Parse this sic: Revised at 805th place. Below 5,000 is Rail (data structure) at 2,247th place. Below or equal to 2,500 bytes are Remove Line Numbers, Total LISTP, and Container starting at 4,555th place. Below 1,250 bytes is JS-- at 6,827th place. Below 500 bytes are ™¥÷¶÷™÷ ~¦¢\¶\ ¶^\, Halting problem (language) and Deutsch, starting at 8,510th place. 250 bytes is Not a brainfuck derivative at 9,018th place, and around 300 places later are the zero-sized pages.

Based on this, we can hypothesize that the distribution of pages is most heavily concentrated in the range of 500 bytes to 10,000 bytes, with the density in that range being shifted more to the lower end somewhere between 5,000 and 1,250 bytes.

TODO: proper data analysis

CLCLC-INTERCAL is a documentary about rizzlers set in sigma town
Retrieved from "https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?title=User:RaiseAfloppaFan3925&oldid=189697"