User talk:Raiseafloppafan7741/Draft IV

Anti-Plushie Python P stores the numbers in its name --dragoneater67 talk contribs (mobile) 08:00, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

To quote the best birdbrain: "So- FUCK!" ——【raiseafloppafan7741 kausapin mo ako【past life・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼・▼(°ʌ°)▼】【overlong signature】】 08:02, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

you can store numbers in the length --dragoneater67 talk contribs 08:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Version Q is plushie-complete

kinda obvious: when anything is removed, this remains a void, then you can store numbers via counting voids.Cleverxia (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

We removed math already so how can you count voids? Also we removed nothing which removes nothingness via "I said so" ——【AnalysisOfVariance | raiseafloppafan7741 mag-usap tayo【past life・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼・▼(°ʌ°)▼】 12:19, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

"nothingness" is still a thing, just as {{{1}}} is not a void Cleverxia (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

also you may store 1 via whether Plushie-completeness is exists. however with only this concept and any other thing including "remove"&"nothingness" removed I can't find a way to store 2...Cleverxia (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Oh right!anti plushie completeness requires the definition of plushie completeness, so we can store 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this makes iteration R 1/3 plushie complete!do you need another 100 iterations?Cleverxia (talk) 12:26, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Version R1 is undefined

without counting how can you check that all of the anti plushie completeness requirements are sayisfued?thus none of anything can be anti plushie complete there.Cleverxia (talk) 12:40, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Good point, but counting the requirements for anti-Plushie-completeness introduces counting and natural numbers which means 2 unfortunately exists, so I will have to come up with some absolutely drunk idea in Anti-Plushie Python R-rE-b. ——【AnalysisOfVariance | raiseafloppafan7741 mag-usap tayo【past life・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼・▼(°ʌ°)▼】 12:42, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

decrementing to -2 still stored 2, I presume?Cleverxia (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

-2 is just -1 * 2, so yes negative numbers imply their positive counterparts and vice versa ——【AnalysisOfVariance | raiseafloppafan7741 mag-usap tayo【past life・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼・▼(°ʌ°)▼】 12:44, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

do you need another revision or resign?Cleverxia (talk) 12:55, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm not giving up when there's cake at stake ——【AnalysisOfVariance | raiseafloppafan7741 mag-usap tayo【past life・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼・▼(°ʌ°)▼】 10:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

the cake is a lie :-) --dragoneater67 [talk|contribs] 11:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Tell that to fungot ——【AnalysisOfVariance | raiseafloppafan7741 mag-usap tayo【past life・投稿】【▼(°v°)▼・▼(°ʌ°)▼】 11:32, 30 September 2026 (UTC)