Talk:Dimensions

As far as I can tell, it doesn't quite reduce to brainfuck, since (as per the spec) loops cannot be nested: [ (resp. ]) is documented to always refer to the nearest following (resp. preceding) ] (resp. [). Nesting of loops is supposedly required for TC in brainfuck. As the Dimensions spec does not seem to require balanced [], the loops are more flexible than simple no-nested-loops brainfuck (and there's the velocity thing that might allow conditional pointer motion), so it might still be TC -- just not proven via brainfuck that directly. --fizzie (talk) 13:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Fixed :-) Rdebath (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC)