Talk:Bitwise Cyclic Tist

whats the difference??? --dragoneater67 [talk|contribs] 12:40, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Its, purely, a formatting thing --Yayimhere2(school) (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

I always wondered why Bitwise Cyclic Tag had its own page separate from Cyclic Tag. –PkmnQ (talk) 13:37, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

a bit off-topic, but i find it easier to understand Bitwise Cyclic Tag than Cyclic Tag (as in the pages) --dragoneater67 [talk|contribs] 17:47, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

I won't deny it feels like the more "complete" of the two, it's just weird how (if I'm willing to be a bit cheeky here) "trivial cyclic tag substitution" is linked over twice as much as the original cyclic tag (though considering brainfuck is a P′′ derivative, and Underload is a Joy subset, maybe it's not that unusual) –PkmnQ (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Wait, I misread the page, I thought this was an independent reinvention of cyclic tag (as in Cordership managed to reinvent the concept of "productions" from the individual-bit description of BCT), but it's not, it's literally just the BCT commands in list form :P –PkmnQ (talk) 18:50, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

this is just bitwise cyclic tag

this is LITERALLY BCT. --c./.o./.r./.d./.e./.r./.s./.h./.i./.p(1and0nlycordershippr) (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2026 (UTC)