Talk:Zzz

jkdfuiojpstkwie4stq63e8903fm9wgue4h6yrjhioyk;dls;gh'dkl[j —ehird 14:48, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Your Brainfuck instruction renaming has qualified you for category 5 brickbraining! This means that after the initial brickbraining, we will put your brain back into your head, then brickbrain you again. This process will continue until your brain ceases to be recognisable as such. Have a grotesquely unpleasant day. Phantom Hoover 14:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I should probably go to the reference implementation to get answers to these questions, but I... don't feel like it. So:

• Are the double-quotes part of the syntax?
• If not, is zzzzzz equivalent to >>> or .. in brainfuck? Or is it an error. OR IS IT AN ERROR? thank you Chris Pressey (talk) 12:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Maybe it branches off into every possible interpretation of the source code in parallel as it runs and has some sort of intentional race for which one is properly evaluated and output, or it combines the outputs of each hypothetical branch somehow, or something else amazing and mindblowing that we never could have imagined. :)

Or maybe there are just spaces between commands? That would certainly be less interesting. 72.49.103.207 02:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Just having the parsing rules be ambiguous might redeem it. At least to the point where it is a derivative instead of an equivalent. Chris Pressey (talk) 16:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC)