I categorized it under Brainfuck equivalents because, well, it is one, except for the input instruction. The Brainfuck equivalents category says only "with or without I/O" so maybe, going by the letter of what has been set up, it's technically a derivative and not an equivalent. I'll let someone else waste their time splitting hairs over it. Chris Pressey (talk) 10:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, you are in fact wrong. The loop semantics are actually different. I'm not sure how they differ, as the spec seems rather confused as to how loops work and the reference implementation does not recognise nested loops, but they definitely aren't the standard BF loop. Phantom Hoover (talk) 12:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
So it's a language for those turned on by code?
I'm so sorry
--(this comment by REDACTED at 18:02, 30 July 2015 UTC; please sign your comments with ~~~~)