From Esolang
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'm not sure how much this language is esoteric. It can be used as a normal imperative language if you don't use classes, methods, or objects. It has some odd syntax but it actually could be used in a practical setting if objects are not used. In fact, there may actually be some benefit in distributing this since it would draw attention to the weird language design. Unfortunately this language would require a particularly advanced parser, and I'm not sure how to do that. I think the whole dynamic class stuff should be pretty easy to implement, just store it as a string and read it every time it needs to be used by an object. The main problem is with the expressions, which I genuinely have no idea how to parse (you could use eval, but there are different operators and arbitrary code would be too easy to run). BoundedBeans (talk) 17:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Maybe a subset of this language would be more esoteric BoundedBeans (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
After programming in this a bit, I realized how remarkably annoying using only NAND gates is for the simplest compound conditions. I think any sort of attempt to make this practical at all would have to add more gates. BoundedBeans (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)