Talk:2D BF

One thing that I notice is inconsistent between the languages here is that either the instruction or memory pointer is not two-dimensional. For any candidate languages, must both of the pointers be 2D? --(this comment by Dunbaroan at 15:51, 19 October 2011 UTC; please sign your comments with ~~~~)

You could well ask what Alegend intended, but I'm inclined to think it's better if both the code space and the memory space are 2D. On this basis, I've just added Sansism. -- Smjg 00:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

I've made a language called Generic 2D Brainfuck that is basically the most minimal thing you can do with brainfuck with a 2D tape and program. Does that work? --Hppavilion1 (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

(suggestion)Shall we move the page into Category:2D BF?

Umm... I don't think it's a correct usage....--YamTokTpaFa (talk) 02:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)