Talk:'Python' is not recognized
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Turing complete?
I'm sure this is turing complete. Here's proof.
Underload This (abc) :a:b:c : = ^ _
Hammy (talk) 14:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- just because it's slightly the same to a language doesn't mean that it's turing complete #47
- This is a proof by translation. Since there exists a corresponding program in this for every underload program it would be turing complete. There is a mistake though, because (abc) pushes every item within as one element meanwhile :a:b:c pushes the as individual elements. --Yayimhere2(school) (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- also this is outdated too
- This is a proof by translation. Since there exists a corresponding program in this for every underload program it would be turing complete. There is a mistake though, because (abc) pushes every item within as one element meanwhile :a:b:c pushes the as individual elements. --Yayimhere2(school) (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Underload PINR (abc) "abc" : same thing ! :? ^ _ s |
- User:Gaham (Discord:glebovsky_)
- Could you try to explain the lambdas better? --Yayimhere2(school) (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2026 (UTC)