i was thinking... could inflection find its way into programming languages?
not that I have any idea what it could be used for.
> x is 2. > 2 xes? 4 > 3 xes? 6
of course using plurals for multiplication is stupid... And such language shoudn't be english based. Latin may be, or Turkish.
- In my mind, the plural of x should be x's. --Ihope127 22:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
If the language were object oriented then nouns would be variables reffering to objects.
Genitive case could be use to denote object's fields or methods. Like:
> FOOBAR = CLASS[int x, int y, int z]. > foobar = FOOBAR[1,2,3]. > foobarin x? 1 > foobarin x = 2. > foobar? FOOBAR(2,2,3]
(here "-in" is a genitive ending (one of actual Turkish or Russian genitive endings)).
Need to contemplate this more
Maybe Esperanto-based? --126.96.36.199 21:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- This would not be very sucessfull, because there are not many inflections for Esperanto (genitive is made with preposition) and only acusative has special ending -n --(this comment by 188.8.131.52 at 20:03, 11 Feb 2007 UTC; please sign your comments with ~~~~)
If the language is not to be based on English (which might be interesting in view of the LTU discussion, but maybe not esoteric enough here) then I would suggest a strongly agglutinative (because otherwise too many different forms of a word may collapse together or be impossible to connect) case language like Hungarian (giving a new meaning to Hungarian notation). Just imagine a programming language with "free" word order. --Ørjan 16:07, 2 Jun 2006 (UTC)
- Nihil sub sole novum. --Ørjan 13:02, 30 Jun 2006 (UTC)
Having just arrived from Wikipedia, I wasn't expecting discussion to be on this page. I left some notes on the "discussion" tab. Rhmccullough 10:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
This seems like a fun idea. I actually really like the idea of a language based on polysynthetic languages - so I might put something together sometime if I get a chance ;) Prof Apex (talk) 01:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)