We are currently working on new rules for what content should and shouldn't be allowed on this website, and are looking for feedback! See Esolang:2026 topicality proposal to view and give feedback on the current draft.
Talk:PlayGround
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ideas for other sublanguages in PlayGround:
- RedRover
- DuckDuckGoose
- Jacks
Okay... so I'm debating certain aspects of the language... so I'd like some suggestions.
- Should each child be limited to holding two ropes? or should they be able to hold unlimmited ropes?
- I'm considering a more concise syntax... although that might be too easy to program with... I'm a bit lazy and really don't feel like writting massive sprawling programs that only print out "Hello, World!"
- Anything else... really... give me some ideas for sublanguages, or anything.
Thanks. The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 02:24, 21 Aug 2006 (UTC)
- Will limiting stuff to two ropes destroy Turing-completeness? If not, go ahead :-) And more concise wouldn't hurt, as long as it's not the syntax that's making this esoteric. Also, if you could make a sublanguage called Jacks... ;-) --Ihope127 11:44, 21 Aug 2006 (UTC)
- Heh. I don't know how to play "Jacks"... but I'll think about it. The esotericness is in... uh... well... it's a pretty weird concept if you think about it... and I'm pretty sure having only two ropes won't limit Turing-ness -The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 20:15, 21 Aug 2006 (UTC)
- Try looking at wikipedia:Jacks. ais523 14:20, 22 Aug 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds like a feasible implementation. --The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 20:26, 28 Aug 2006 (UTC)
- Try looking at wikipedia:Jacks. ais523 14:20, 22 Aug 2006 (UTC)
- Heh. I don't know how to play "Jacks"... but I'll think about it. The esotericness is in... uh... well... it's a pretty weird concept if you think about it... and I'm pretty sure having only two ropes won't limit Turing-ness -The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 20:15, 21 Aug 2006 (UTC)