00:00:39 zzo38: I would rename defun 'addfun'. 00:00:47 Makes Lisp FUN! 00:01:14 is Links (or any of its variants) at all usable? do the missing features get irksome? 00:02:32 iconmaster: Is there some command in Lisp to rename commands? If there is, then you can use that in your own programs, maybe. 00:04:33 -!- Mathnerd314 has joined. 00:04:48 zzo38: IDK, I haven't gotten that far in my Lisp book i'm reading. I bet it's there, though. I actually dont know much Lisp. 00:06:51 zzo38: there is 00:07:15 -!- Sgeo has quit (Quit: IRC is taking up too much of my time. I need time to study the Bible and find Christ.). 00:07:24 in fact, it was probably the first language to have a complete meta-programming language built in. 00:07:52 -!- variable has quit (Quit: /dev/io failed). 00:08:13 -!- variable has joined. 00:12:25 hi variable 00:12:39 is Links (or any of its variants) at all usable? do the missing features get irksome? 00:12:47 it's more usable than lynx, less usable than anything else. 00:12:57 elinks supports slightly more than links I think, but most people seem to prefer links. 00:12:58 -!- Sgeo has joined. 00:13:03 also links has that graphical mode that can even work on the framebuffer. 00:14:52 my real question is "can it run gmail right" 00:15:24 hahaha. 00:15:27 quintopia: you mean the javascript version? 00:15:30 hahahahahahaha 00:15:43 i know links and variants support js 00:15:49 i don't know which versions 00:15:52 yeah. no. 00:15:56 on the latest variants 00:15:59 The only telephone in all of hell (local calls only, please). 00:16:03 links' js engine was removed IIRC 00:16:06 because it was unsalvagably shit 00:16:16 quintopia: why don't you want to use a graphical browser, anyway 00:16:19 or gmail's html version 00:16:34 eh, i'd give the latter a shot 00:16:39 quintopia: why don't you want to use a graphical browser, anyway 00:16:51 i don't want to use a mouse 00:16:56 quintopia: conkeror. vimperator 00:17:05 both much easier to use w/ kb than links 00:17:12 yeah? 00:17:17 do tell 00:17:18 considering they're designed for it, yes. 00:17:32 conkeror if you want emacs. vimperator if you want vim. 00:17:35 they don't require me to memorize thousands of keyboard shortcuts do they? 00:17:44 i want it to be obvious which keys do what 00:17:46 try a dozen. 00:17:56 a key is just a single letter. it is impossible for it to be self-documenting. 00:17:58 you want dry water. 00:18:12 but it can be obvious 00:18:23 like the way irssi maps keys to windows 00:18:32 it makes perfect intuitive sense 00:18:35 ok. so that's a single numerical selection done. 00:18:38 and you can only have one of them 00:18:41 it doesn't have to be self-documenting, jsut intuitive 00:18:44 that does not in any way generalise. 00:18:57 intuitive is another word for familiar. you are evidently new to these kinds of browsers. 00:19:04 thus apart from the common subset shared with editors, it cannot be intuitive. 00:19:09 they are not the same thing 00:19:14 yes, they really are 00:19:24 http://www.asktog.com/papers/raskinintuit.html 00:19:28 intuitive equals familiar. 00:19:42 no, they are similar concepts, but not the same 00:19:47 they are the same. 00:19:51 quintopia: anyway, if you actually want it, learning a dozen or so keys is trivially a sunk cost. 00:20:04 if you use a browser often, it would be difficult for them not to stick. 00:20:05 intuitive means "there is a ready metaphor for mapping the new ideas to familiar ones" 00:20:13 they don't have to already be familiar in themselves 00:20:25 but yeah a dozen doesn't sound bad 00:20:32 quintopia: http://www.asktog.com/papers/raskinintuit.html 00:20:38 intuitive equals familiar. 00:20:41 "there is a ready metaphor ..." = familiar. 00:20:53 why do you keep citing that page when i've already told you i disagree with it 00:21:07 or maybe i disagree with your use of "equals" 00:21:26 quintopia: because you responded instantly and therefore have not read it 00:21:33 (or you would have responded, "I've read that before") 00:22:23 it's very long. shall i go read it and come back and tell you whether i've changed my mind about disagreeing of your self-proclaimed summary of it? 00:22:25 jef raskin is(/was) pretty much the god of human-computer interaction, so the article is well worth reading 00:22:36 quintopia: yes. also, my summary is in fact the title. 00:22:50 so it is 00:22:54 i don't really expect you'll change your mind as people rarely do, at least not immediately, but *shrug* 00:23:03 how can i agree with a paper when i disagree with its title? 00:24:03 how many people will disagree vehemently when they hear "Property is theft!" and on further consideration of Proudhon's words, agree? 00:24:07 I'd say significantly more than zero. 00:24:18 the article is to convince you that the title means something, and that that meaning is true 00:24:41 you are expected, therefore, to have an open mind about the topic in question for the duration of reading and mentally processing the article. this is how things work, I think. 00:26:27 come ooon, bitcoins! get mined! 00:26:31 SO CLOSE TO 0.01 00:26:53 omfgg my gpu sucks hard 00:27:01 i'm getting like 5.6 megahashes/sec 00:27:09 and people with real graphics cards get >300 00:27:39 i can agree with the part where it says "intuitive = uses readily transferred, existing skills." that's almost exactly what i said earlier. 00:28:17 quintopia: then what is your definition of familiar 00:28:18 22:19:35: elliott, why do you want to do befunge93? Besides how many fingerprints did you do in your last befunge98 implementation? And did you publish the source anywhere? 00:28:28 Vorpal: I wanted to do befunge-93 because I dunno, I felt like I could get it fast. 00:28:54 Vorpal: 00:28:55 [~/Code/shiro/Shiro/Fingerprints]% l *.hs 00:28:55 BOOL.hs DIRF.hs EVAR.hs FILE.hs FING.hs MODU.hs NULL.hs REFC.hs ROMA.hs 00:28:59 right 00:29:06 (One of those is incomplete; I forget which.) 00:29:10 I just hope it don't die next time you move to another computer 00:29:18 I could easily add more, but I'm waiting on a monadic epiphany to reduce code clutter. 00:29:22 familiar means basically "automatic" in my mind. muscle memory. no remapping is needed, because you've done this before, you've got this. 00:29:29 elliott, thus I hope you uploaded the source somewhere 00:29:43 also, how else could it get into mycology? 00:29:47 Vorpal: It still passes Mycology in less than a second. 00:29:57 I suspect that would be quicker were I not running that miner. Maybe. 00:29:59 elliott, yep. And? 00:30:03 Maybe not. 00:30:10 quintopia: that's "known" 00:30:14 elliott, miner? Err? 00:30:41 elliott: yes. i would agree with familiar=known 00:30:48 -!- augur has quit (Remote host closed the connection). 00:30:55 Vorpal: re: another computer, it won't. 00:31:05 Vorpal: I haven't uploaded it yet but I will do once I restructure it and add enough to run slowdown.b98. 00:31:12 ah 00:31:24 then I'll replace the fungespace with that one I was considering to make that go quickly. 00:31:30 What do you mean by how else could it get into Mycology? 00:31:33 Vorpal: miner - bitcoins. 00:32:00 ah 00:32:08 elliott, Deewiant's style of funge space? Or your own? 00:32:26 You mean the one Deewiant has now or the one Deewiant wishes he had (k-d tree)? 00:32:40 elliott, either actually 00:32:58 I was planning on a bounding volume hierarchy type thing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounding_volume_hierarchy), because a random Stack Overflow comment said it was usually lighter-weight than k-d trees. Also I /msg'd Deewiant about it and he said it might be suitable. :p 00:33:01 elliott, besides wasn't k-d to organise the boxes or such? 00:33:13 Well, yes. But "the boxes" are just flat arrays. 00:33:17 indeed 00:33:28 I might go with a quadtree in-between because it's easy. 00:33:33 But I don't think that'd help with slowdown, much. 00:34:08 -!- mtve has joined. 00:34:13 But anyway, I'm pretty happy with Shiro as it is; it passes Mycology with flying colours, and quickly; it doesn't leak memory (that I know of); etc. 00:34:23 And it's still less than 4000 lines last I checked. 00:34:28 elliott, tried valgrind on it? 00:34:29 (Including fingerprints.) 00:34:33 Vorpal: Uh. It's Haskell. 00:34:40 Vorpal: I don't think it'd like the GC. 00:34:45 Vorpal: Or anything. 00:34:55 elliott, valgrind can manage with some GCs. It doesn't crash for all... 00:35:07 elliott: is shiro now a complete impl of b98? 00:35:10 I can >/dev/null with valgrind, right? 00:35:12 And it prints to stderr? 00:35:14 elliott, For example, with python's GC it just spews errors, instead of crashing. 00:35:19 quintopia: It's been a complete impl since about day three or four :P 00:35:23 elliott, I think valgrind goes to stderr yes 00:35:27 Maybe even late day two. 00:35:50 Hmm, valgrind sure does slow a program down. 00:35:51 elliott, more like mid-morning day three 00:35:55 iirc 00:36:07 Well, whatever. Early on :) 00:36:15 Uh, I should probably do --leak-check=full? 00:36:19 At least it printed no errors, just summaries. 00:36:22 elliott, but anyway, it wouldn't have been that fast without the constant help of Deewiant 00:36:23 It "suppressed" 4 from 4, though. 00:36:41 elliott, suppressed is about stuff in libc. 00:36:41 Vorpal: Well, actually, after I figured out how profiling works most of the optimisation was me. 00:36:45 Apart from that one stupid function. 00:36:56 It was the *compliance* that Deewiant helped shitloads with :P 00:37:05 (I know how profiling works, I mean, I just didn't know how to get GHC to do it.) 00:37:11 elliott, like, strlen optimised because it knows it can access invalid memory as long as it doesn't cross a page boundary 00:37:13 that sort of stuff 00:37:32 It was the *compliance* that Deewiant helped shitloads with :P <-- that is what I meant 00:37:40 elliott, I meant fast, as in fast development 00:37:49 Ah. 00:37:49 not fast as in fast execution 00:38:12 Well, see, Deewiant is the only person who knows the details of Deewiantfunge-98, which is the language that every Mycology-compliant interpreter implements :P 00:38:32 ==18138== 98,964 (384 direct, 98,580 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 16 of 16 00:38:32 ==18138== at 0x4C2815C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) 00:38:32 ==18138== by 0x593FAE2: __gconv_open (gconv_open.c:197) 00:38:32 ==18138== by 0x593F5F1: iconv_open (iconv_open.c:72) 00:38:32 ==18138== by 0x4AA0C4: ??? (in /home/elliott/Code/shiro/shiro) 00:38:42 Dunno what that's about. (With --leak-check=full.) 00:38:48 hm 00:38:48 Anyway: ==18138== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. 00:38:53 Pretty sure the GC keeps a pointer to things. 00:39:00 hm 00:39:17 And I'm also pretty sure that garbage can be left un-freed if they escape the GC. Say it's conservative, or the program ends before it gets GC'd. 00:39:22 So I wouldn't trust valgrind much here. 00:39:25 elliott, "Deewiantfunge-98" is one of the saner interpretations of the confusing standard. As far as I know the only direct contradiction he makes towards the standard is making t actually work. 00:39:37 Vorpal: also y's interpretation of bounds 00:39:47 unless you consider the statement that something is useful for something else bound by sanity and taking precedence over the previous line 00:39:54 elliott, Nope. The standard contradict itself there. 00:39:57 no 00:40:02 it just doesn't use the same definition of useful as you 00:40:06 elliott, It is said to be suitable iirc? 00:40:11 it says "useful" 00:40:13 ah... 00:40:18 also, it's in italics, and written informally, which makes me question its normativity 00:40:26 elliott, should ask cpressy next time he shows up 00:40:27 but even if you accept it, you have to assume "useful" is used sanely 00:40:37 and binding the Funge-98 standard to sanity is a bad idea :-D 00:40:39 elliott, come on, the whole standard is written pretty informally :P 00:40:51 Vorpal: re: cpressey: I think he's heard enough about Funge-98 for one lifetime :P 00:40:58 And seems to know the spec less well than we do. 00:41:00 hm true 00:41:05 yeah 00:41:06 elliott: as i recall, there was still a major bug past day 7 which prevented it from being called an implementation at all 00:41:17 quintopia: Which bug...? 00:41:26 If you mean the "o" thing, yes, that took a little while to fix. 00:41:30 But that's pretty minor. 00:41:31 o is optional? 00:41:34 That's true. 00:41:38 elliott, what o thing btw? 00:41:42 Vorpal: text mode, I think. 00:41:48 I implemented o but did it a bit wrongly, because I hadn't bothered to get it right yet. 00:41:50 ah yes that one is a PITA 00:41:54 But since o is optional, I could flip one bit and everything would be fine :P 00:41:59 (in y, and also make o reflect) 00:42:11 oh, and i too I guess 00:42:25 anyway, running slowdown and running fungot are the priorities, in that order. but it's still pending on me figuring out a nice way to express the maybe stacks. 00:42:25 elliott: and are you really interested or are you just rather stuck as to what the point is that using your own macros. at least not for implementing scheme? 00:42:31 elliott, text and binary more in i and o don't correspond at all in functionality :P 00:42:39 fungot: truth. 00:42:39 elliott: allocate to that result ( i.e., he's probably devoting much more time 00:42:41 Vorpal: *mode 00:42:47 indeed 00:43:16 so i think rcfunge is now completely unmaintained 00:43:20 last release april 2010 by susan 00:43:30 likely 00:43:30 not that cfunge has had a more recent release, admitteldy 00:43:31 *admittedly 00:43:42 did you ever implement that O(1) wrapping? 00:43:55 elliott, hm nope, forget. Will look at it this weekend. 00:44:16 elliott, and then probably get a release out some day soon. The code is pretty stable nowdays. 00:44:24 i cheated with that one, spawned a new thread to look into the trivial problem rather than devoting brain cells to it 00:44:34 (aka: asked my reading-mathematics friend) 00:44:46 (just to give him a taste of what his degree will go towards!) 00:44:50 (being bugged with trivialities!) 00:44:56 elliott, wait what? I don't get the context of that line " i cheated with that one, [...]" 00:45:03 Vorpal: the O(1) wrapping 00:45:05 oh 00:45:19 and reading is the Posh(tm) term for studying, before you ask 00:45:23 well, getting-a-degree-in 00:45:30 elliott, what math friend? oerjan? 00:45:40 no. not someone in this channel 00:45:43 oh 00:45:49 elliott, what's wrong with oerjan? 00:45:50 and I think oerjan's mathematics got read quite some time ago :D 00:45:57 yes that's true 00:45:58 Vorpal: i don't trust him to actually do work :D 00:46:12 elliott, you mean he will tell you to do it yourself? 00:46:20 no, he'll just sulk off. 00:46:23 ah 00:46:54 hmm, I used System.Posix.Env rather than foreign. 00:46:55 how loser of me. 00:47:21 class (Show fp, Typeable fp, 00:47:21 Typeable (FPGlobalState fp), 00:47:21 Typeable (FPIPState fp), 00:47:21 Show (FPGlobalState fp), 00:47:21 Show (FPIPState fp)) => 00:47:21 Fingerprint fp where 00:47:25 impressive 00:47:38 hmm, I used System.Posix.Env rather than foreign. <-- why is that an issue? 00:48:08 windows! 00:48:22 oh 01:02:14 huh, multics was written in a (relatively) HLL (for the 60s) 01:02:55 ah, PL/I it seems 01:09:50 Vorpal: i don't trust him to actually do work :D <-- YOU ARE WISE BEYOND YOUR YEARS. well, sometimes. 01:12:17 Someone in this channel said before that draws occur 50% in cricket. I suppose one way to make draws occur less often is to make the rules changed a bit during the last half hour of play. 01:13:03 wait, do we have someone who actually understand the rules of cricket in here? 01:13:20 I thought that was impossible unless you played it 01:13:41 he doesn't even watch it 01:13:49 wow, the word "forum" for a BBS dates back to the 60s (multics) 01:14:13 -!- GreaseMonkey has joined. 01:14:22 -!- GreaseMonkey has quit (Changing host). 01:14:22 -!- GreaseMonkey has joined. 01:14:27 or, well, could be 70s 01:14:29 Vorpal: It isn't impossible. It is just a bit difficult. 01:16:35 zzo38, ... ... ... I suggest you look up hyperbole in a dictionary. 01:18:12 hmm, multics has similarities to my system 01:18:16 -!- coppro has quit (Read error: Operation timed out). 01:18:22 -!- coppro has joined. 01:18:37 elliott: What similarities? 01:18:52 many 01:19:39 What is a few? 01:20:47 the fs/ram unification, use of paging, use of REPL as shell... 01:20:51 "502 Bad Gateway" --mining.bitcoin.cz 01:20:53 i don't like the sound of that, nginx 01:23:06 Can you please tell me what REPL means? 01:30:20 -!- augur has joined. 01:33:28 zzo38: Read-Eval-Print-Loop. 01:33:44 (define (repl) (display (eval (read))) (newline) (repl)) ;; an example (minimal) REPL in scheme 01:33:59 basically, a prompt that lets you input program snippets, have them evaluated, and see the result. 01:34:10 an interactive shell is this for the language sh 01:34:58 hey, algol 68 called a procedure printf. wonder if it does the same as c printf. 01:35:41 yep, well kinda 01:35:47 more like a variadic print procedure 01:35:51 sort of 01:35:53 printf (($2l"The sum is:"x, g(0)$, m + n)); ¢ prints the same as: ¢ 01:35:54 print ((new line, new line, "The sum is:", space, whole (m + n, 0)) 01:37:02 -!- Gregor has changed nick to libc\x2Eso. 01:37:16 What's it at now -- $5,000? Hit your limit yet? 01:37:34 I'm not going to discuss it in this channel. 01:37:48 lol 01:38:35 -!- augur has quit (Remote host closed the connection). 01:46:35 -!- Mathnerd314 has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds). 01:49:10 -!- azaq23 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds). 01:50:16 -!- azaq23 has joined. 02:03:01 00:07:15: -!- Sgeo has quit (Quit: IRC is taking up too much of my time. I need time to study the Bible and find Christ.). 02:03:01 00:12:58: -!- Sgeo has joined #esoteric. 02:03:06 Sgeo: that's a record time for finding christ 02:03:20 you could enter the christianlympics 02:05:06 That's addquotable :P 02:05:27 * elliott CACKLES EVILLY AS HE PLACES HIS $5,000 BID 02:05:35 YES IT WAS ME ALL ALONG 02:05:41 * elliott CACKLES SOME MORE 02:06:02 `addquote 00:07:15: -!- Sgeo has quit (Quit: IRC is taking up too much of my time. I need time to study the Bible and find Christ.). 00:12:58: -!- Sgeo has joined #esoteric. 02:06:04 If you won't addquote it :P 02:06:04 344) 00:07:15: -!- Sgeo has quit (Quit: IRC is taking up too much of my time. I need time to study the Bible and find Christ.). 00:12:58: -!- Sgeo has joined #esoteric. 02:06:18 `delquote 344 02:06:19 *poof* 02:06:27 (reformatting) 02:06:28 ... why? 02:06:30 Ah 02:06:52 Did you see when I said that the baker should support s/// lines? >: ) 02:06:53 `addquote 00:07 Sgeo has quit (IRC is taking up too much of my time. I need time to study the Bible and find Christ.) 00:12 Sgeo has joined #esoteric. 02:06:55 344) 00:07 Sgeo has quit (IRC is taking up too much of my time. I need time to study the Bible and find Christ.) 00:12 Sgeo has joined #esoteric. 02:07:06 (Yes there's inconsistency wrt quit vs joined formatting, yes it looks better this way :P) 02:07:07 -!- wawawareya has changed nick to wareya. 02:07:12 libc\x2Eso: X_X 02:07:18 libc\x2Eso: I was gonna do a client plugin for that once :P 02:11:26 -!- azaq23 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds). 02:11:42 hi elliott 02:11:46 sorry for the delayed reply 02:11:51 I said something? 02:11:52 :P 02:12:09 hi variable 02:12:12 oh 02:12:14 er 02:12:16 did i say anything else 02:12:19 no 02:12:22 hmm 02:12:27 wonder what i was gonna say!!!! 02:12:45 elliott: btw: what about w3m vs links? 02:12:52 oh, you just joined 02:12:58 variable: right. i like w3m a lot. 02:13:02 it isn't really similar to links though. 02:13:08 w3m is more like lynx that doesn't suck 02:13:14 links is more like a graphical browser rendered to a tty 02:13:37 What we need is e.g. a WebKit backend for curses. 02:13:40 It would be weird. 02:13:44 But it would be the best text browser. 02:14:01 libc\x2Eso: no. A Presto backend 02:14:27 variable: Good luck with convincing Opera :P 02:14:47 -!- azaq23 has joined. 02:14:55 best april fools joke today: "The GNOME Project is a community which comes together to make great software. " 02:15:09 -!- iconmaster has quit (Quit: I wish I had something witty to put here...). 02:15:21 libc\x2Eso: fine, find, Trident 02:15:26 *fine, fine 02:15:32 best april fools joke today: "The GNOME Project is a community which comes together to make great software. " 02:15:33 ouch :D 02:16:11 variable: Saying this as somebody who hates Apple and has painful experiences with WebKit, what do you have against WebKit? 02:17:11 libc\x2Eso: absolutely nothing 02:17:16 I love how everyone (programmer) who hates Apple loves WebKit and LLVM, in fact the two seem almost directly correlated :P 02:17:16 I was making a joke 02:17:22 It's so angsty! 02:17:32 elliott: I hate apple and love webkit and llvm :-p 02:17:39 variable: see! 02:17:40 angst! 02:18:01 I have no opinion on WebKit, although I do use it. And I like the idea of LLVM, but know little about it. Then again, the fact that I rarely actually write code... 02:18:22 MINE QUICKER, GPU 02:18:25 I have compiled WebKit. Many times. It has done things to me that are horribly inappropriate. 02:18:28 MINE MINE MINE 02:18:44 libc\x2Eso: It's sorry, it's just... it's just... it's just somewhat Sparta *breaks down sobbing* 02:18:57 elliott: No, that's v8 :P 02:19:05 IT'S SOMEWHAT SPAAAARTAAAA ;;;__;;;; 02:21:20 V8 is twisted 02:21:34 it has some insane optimizations - but is completely twisted 02:22:05 define twisted 02:22:38 the fact that js-heavy things are STILL quite slow IRL even with insane things like v8 worries me 02:22:45 I dunno what causes it, though 02:22:48 probably the DOM, nobody likes the DOM 02:22:52 let's blame the DOM 02:24:50 wow, the .p2p has turned into the worst proposal evar 02:24:55 Mainly DOM, rendering and the conversion layers between JS and the real implementation of the DOM. 02:25:05 central authority (LOL), based on trusting existing CAs (LOL) 02:25:08 "Require ownership of the same domain under another tld (like .net,.com,.org)" 02:25:13 and first-come first serve 02:25:14 lol 02:25:26 What's ... the point? 02:25:32 at this point? to fail 02:25:43 previously it was to create a decentralised naming system after the revocation rights were abused 02:25:45 (I forget in what case) 02:25:50 oh, I think it was the wikileaks debacle 02:26:02 or, no 02:26:04 ICANN domain seizures 02:26:04 whatever 02:26:09 err 02:26:11 US domain seizures 02:26:17 I want to own some semi-provocative .xxx domain with totally uninteresting content, just to be the only non-porn domain on .xxx (that doesn't just forward elsewhere) 02:26:17 nice typo there 02:26:36 Just get scholarly-discussion.xxx 02:26:58 UnofficialOverclockingEULA = I confirm that I am aware of unofficial overclocking limitations and fully understand that MSI will not provide me any support on it 02:27:00 ^ BEST SETTING EVER 02:27:06 Naw, I would get college-action.xxx and then it'll just be a discussion of various scholarly topics. 02:27:17 what is the character that in vim means "the entire file" (as a range)? 02:27:32 libc\x2Eso: hot-college-teen-actions: What to do if you're a female college student and just need to cool down! 02:27:38 *action: 02:27:43 Err, forgot to mention female in there. 02:27:49 hot-teen-college-girl-action 02:29:03 Sgeo: So did you find Christ? 02:29:44 hot-christ-on-college-girl-action.xxx // about college students finding Jesus 02:30:52 elliott, I did find an empty cave... 02:31:03 fuck-me-jesus-say-wet-lesbian-college-girls: Girls in college, who happen to be lesbian, after a water pistol fight, realise the inaccuracy of their previous beliefs and exclaim "Fuck me -- Jesus!", as an admittance that Jesus is the answer. 02:31:11 .xxx 02:31:15 Ok, that came out wrong. I did not intend for that to sound serious 02:31:28 Sgeo: THAT EMPTY CAVE IS JESUS. 02:31:50 libc\x2Eso: So anyway, about "semi-provocative" :P 02:32:01 :P 02:32:13 http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/File:JesusOrgy.jpg 02:32:49 lol 02:34:28 quintopia: for ex mode ranges, % 02:34:51 for normal mode, G provided you are at the beginning to start with 02:35:30 oerjan: yeah i figured it out 02:35:49 or 1G if you are at the end 02:35:57 prepare for a visitor 02:35:59 be stately 02:36:04 can you give an s command that would replace the first letter of a word with F and the remaining letters with U? 02:36:14 I do not like a lot of the new TLDs. 02:36:27 i know vi doesn't support perl regexes, so i'm not sure how to do it 02:36:41 .xxx isn't a tld 02:36:59