00:00:17 I think I will use Dropbear for the standard ssh server and client. 00:00:20 http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/dropbear.html 00:09:13 hmm 00:09:19 What's the opposite of a dependency? 00:09:28 i.e., thing-that-depends-on 00:09:34 rather than thiing-that-is-depended-on 00:09:45 *thing 00:10:00 Depender? 00:18:32 independency? 00:18:32 ha 00:18:51 dependee? 00:19:15 ehird: http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/tools.html 00:20:04 Yeah, I know; but rabid devotion to olde unixes is not rational. You won't see any simplifying improvements from Heirloom. 00:20:09 Nevertheless, it is one option. 00:20:24 depender depends on dependee 00:20:41 though, I don't know if they are real words 00:20:42 http://asm.sourceforge.net/asmutils.html ? 00:20:44 MizardX: right, but I want the analogue to dependency :P 00:21:17 pikhq: Might as well just use Busybox then; more widely used, just as over-minimal and without the crazy assemblyness. 00:21:18 Thanks for reminding me of Heirloom, though. 00:21:20 Forgot about it. 00:21:34 Fair enough. 00:21:56 pikhq: If you're adventurous, could you see if the programs in `CVSROOT=anoncvs@anoncvs.NetBSD.org:/cvsroot cvs checkout -P src/bin` will compile on Linux? Small download. 00:22:15 Makefiles are broken without the surrounding tree; just do `cc -I. *.c -o name` in a directory. 00:22:21 Most compile here on OS X; some don't, though. 00:22:29 But then, OS X is basically BSD. 00:22:44 ehird: Lemme pull up my i686 vm. 00:22:55 Why, what are you using now? 00:22:59 x86_64. 00:23:02 Ah. 00:23:17 Shouldn't change things, but okay. 00:23:18 Heh, their ed doesn't support i 00:23:25 Though, it's *NetBSD*. I'd imagine they're somewhat smart about architectures. 00:23:28 Just a 00:23:35 wait, isn't that which depends a "dependent"? 00:23:44 The context is an error like: 00:24:15 $ rmpkg important-thing 00:24:15 Can't; (word)s are: 00:24:15 some-program 00:24:16 some-other-program 00:24:16 If you're sure, use -f. 00:24:23 i.e. can't; things that depend on this are: 00:25:06 So many compile errors... 00:25:20 Which program? 00:25:25 "ls" should work. 00:25:27 Most of them. 00:25:33 Erm, wait. 00:25:34 Does ed work? 00:25:45 cd ed; cc -I. *.c -o ed 00:25:48 No. 00:25:52 Errors? 00:26:04 buf.c:36: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before string constant 00:26:13 buf.c:107: error: ‘MAXINT’ undeclared (first use in this function) 00:26:17 #if 0 00:26:17 static char *rcsid = "@(#)buf.c,v 1.4 1994/02/01 00:34:35 alm Exp"; 00:26:17 #else 00:26:17 __RCSID("$NetBSD: buf.c,v 1.26 2006/03/17 14:37:14 rumble Exp $"); 00:26:18 #endif 00:26:23 ... It goes on further. 00:26:23 Somehow, I doubt that's the line 36 it's talking about. 00:26:45 static const char rcsid[] __attribute__((__unused__)) = "$NetBSD: buf.c,v 1.26 2006/03/17 14:37:14 rumble Exp $"; 00:26:56 WTF is that error about, then? 00:27:22 Also... buf.c doesn't say MAXINT, anywhere. 00:27:52 I'm going to go try it on i686. 00:28:05 Oh, you were using the x86_64. 00:28:09 ... still doesn't explain it. 00:29:17 Incidentally, how's this for initlevels: 00:29:22 # kill -QUIT 1 00:31:40 ehird: How about "supports" ? 00:32:01 MizardX: Technically correct, but it seems odd — supports is generally used as in "X supports Y" 00:32:04 -!- iamcal has quit. 00:32:11 as opposed to "Can't; supports are:" 00:32:16 (contrast "Can't; dependencies are:") 00:33:25 -!- adam_d has quit ("Leaving"). 00:33:28 "depended on by" 00:33:33 Yeah, that works :-P 00:34:59 Hm 00:35:20 It would appears that the problem with NetBSD tools is the macros are hard to hunt down & fetch... 00:35:43 Same issues on i686-pc-linux-gnu, BTW. 00:36:03 #ifdef INT_MAX 00:36:04 # define LINECHARS INT_MAX/* max chars per line */ 00:36:04 #else 00:36:04 # define LINECHARS MAXINT/* max chars per line */ 00:36:04 #endif 00:36:09 pikhq: I think the issue is just header files. 00:36:16 #if defined(sun) || defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__APPLE__) 00:36:16 # include 00:36:16 #endif 00:36:25 pikhq: -D__NetBSD__, wouldya? 00:36:48 ehird: is probably also causing issues. 00:37:14 Mmf. 00:37:30 Such a shame, because these tools are very good... well-maintained, compatible, yet simple. 00:37:54 May be able to get them to work with patching. 00:38:47 How? 00:39:12 pikhq: Oh, for ed, you need -lcrypt. 00:39:14 Just so you know. 00:39:17 Oh, and add -DDES. 00:39:25 Oops, and -DBACKWARDS 00:39:31 (Reading the Makefile) 00:39:48 Oh, I don't have an -lcrypt... 00:40:58 Hmm. Remove the sys/cdefs.h and the following info boilerplate, and... You get linker errors from nonexistent functions. 00:41:07 Since BSD libc has things glibc doesn't. 00:41:16 Hmm. 00:41:20 Got any alternative libcs in that VM? 00:41:25 Since I won't be using glibc... 00:41:45 Nothing that will have BSD extensions. 00:42:45 What a shame this is. 00:42:59 * ehird downloads the Heirloom Toolchest, to look at the code 00:43:33 Also, I can't get asmutils to build at all. *shakes fist* 00:44:00 You know what would be nice? If there was a vi clone that wasn't anally vi-compatible, but didn't have vim's bloat. 00:44:17 (I hate systems that use a traditional vi clone as `which vi`, but vim?) 00:45:21 pikhq: Oh, btw, this is interesting: http://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2008/11/six-million-dollar-libc.html 00:45:25 Android's BSD-licensed, minimal libc 00:45:39 Uses Doug Lea's malloc (dlmalloc). 00:45:49 * oerjan tried to take the page seriously and chose Annihilation, fwiw 00:45:58 ehird: Hmm. 00:46:07 oerjan, I chose Online 00:46:08 oerjan: You're suicidal, then. 00:46:47 You know, submitting "Annihilation" is just one of many methods of suicide. If you think it's the right option, you're suicidal. 00:47:03 It's not like you should be afraid of being bored. If you are, set the time limit 00:47:10 ehird: Will work well for non-C++ stuff, I'd imagine. 00:47:23 pikhq: I can get the STL from elsewhere. 00:47:35 conditionally suicidal. the condition being that i were a simulation in a computer in an atheist 23th (?) century world 00:47:35 Exceptions. 00:47:36 who would be afraid of getting bored in either the online or the dream choices? 00:47:48 everything changes 00:47:56 Sgeo: The time limit is for being bored and suffering from akrasia, to be precise (as much as I hate the Less Wrong crowd using that word like it's their baby). 00:47:56 No need to do it. 00:47:58 and in the latter, your memory would fade away eventually 00:48:08 Oranjer: Some people think death is a good thing. When pressed they may say that eventual death is a good thing, just not now. 00:48:10 They are not rational. 00:48:23 But picking Annihilation? 00:48:24 I agree as to their irrationality 00:48:28 That's being suicidal right now. 00:48:40 I would probably agree 00:48:50 The dream choice is scary... you may eventually adjust, and start to tie together the pieces. 00:49:02 And once you do, you stop fooling yourself. But you're trapped. 00:49:06 Oranjer: i was wavering on Dream a bit though 00:49:07 Cue consciousness claustrophobia. 00:49:18 oerjan: so, any rebuttals to the accusation that you're suicidal? 00:49:34 ehird, have you seen the movie "Vanilla Sky", or the spanish-language movie it is a remake of? 00:49:54 I believe it was on TV one time or something. But it's an old idea. 00:49:59 I know 00:50:11 ehird: depends on your definition of suicidal. 00:50:16 but your tying it together just reminded me of that 00:50:29 oerjan: Well, you had a choice where you could die or not die, and it would be entirely your own choice. 00:50:43 And the dying would be a separate action, rather than an inaction or reaction. 00:50:50 You chose to die; i.e., you killed yourself. How's that not suicide? 00:50:55 * Sgeo wonders if, in Online, he could program "Dream" for himself 00:51:01 So I could switch between the two 00:51:15 Online is the only open-ended one. 00:51:18 haha 00:51:19 yeah 00:51:25 Sure, the real dudes will ignore you, but will that be true forever? 00:51:26 hell, you could maybe create your own body 00:51:32 Exactly! 00:51:36 yay 00:51:36 ehird: it's a suicide in an imagined scenario. 00:51:37 Reality is overrated. 00:51:40 revolt! 00:51:45 oerjan: Yes, but you tried to take it seriously, says ye. 00:52:08 My prefered afterlife would be the one described by Sam Hughes, I think 00:52:20 ehird: i tried to take the _context_ seriously too. my choice was not valid unless i accepted that context. 00:52:48 oerjan: So, what? An artificial consciousness is a lesser existence than a real one? Define artificial./ 00:52:52 *artificial. 00:53:09 Silicon-based instead of carbon-based, what's the difference. 00:53:20 Sgeo: Too solitary for me. 00:53:39 Add in computer terminals with chatrooms! 00:53:46 haha 00:53:48 And then you could arrange to meet with people 00:54:04 Deadfacebook.com access, to meet up with all your dead friends 00:54:20 http://www.picturesforsadchildren.com/index.php?comicID=294 00:54:34 ↑ pretty cool afterlife, if you're not claustrophobic 00:55:00 * Sgeo would get lonely 00:55:11 And the only way to talk to friends would be to be buried near them :/ 00:55:24 Which really, REALLY, sucks 00:55:42 Also, what about cremated people. They're dead dead 00:55:55 Their ashes wake up! 00:56:05 Or, you know, they're dead dead. 00:56:10 SO DON'T GET CREMATED 00:56:14 Get buried above ground or something 00:56:16 "buried" 00:56:26 ehird: it wasn't so much the artificiality as _who_ was running it 00:56:37 oerjan: but, e.g. in online, it'd be irrelevant 00:56:42 he'd have no control over you any more 00:56:45 in fact, in all of them it's irrelevant 00:56:49 he relinquishes you 00:56:53 you're free 00:56:55 by who, i mean which civilization 00:57:01 ah 00:57:03 what's wrong with it 00:57:19 it contains no God :D 00:57:33 I don't think it explicitely says that 00:57:36 yes it does, and he wrote that page 00:57:44 besides, you _want_ a dictator to exist? why? 00:57:57 god is a scary idea, irrespective of its existence 00:58:14 * Sgeo wants Heaven to exist. If that's dependent on God, then I want God to exist 00:58:34 Why do you want heaven to exist? It's not a utopia, it's a dictatorship. 00:58:52 The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive 00:58:58 Exactly 00:59:02 but I could not be happy in a dictatorship 00:59:14 If you just mean a blissful place, well, what a copout, we can perfectly hypothesise that without god, we could create it 00:59:27 I agree 00:59:28 Going "oh, but we need god to make it" is just laziness. 00:59:39 Or learned helplessness, whatever. 01:00:05 I also wish to Immanentize the eschaton 01:00:30 Funny, I want to stop people using that phrase even though I've never seen it used before. 01:00:56 i vaguely recall seeing it, or something like it 01:01:04 ehird, a blissful place for dead people 01:01:06 I googled it. 01:01:18 Sgeo: I see. Why dead people? 01:01:21 Where we can learn whatever we want, interact with whoever we want, if they want to interact with us 01:01:24 They're not dead, anyway. 01:01:33 An afterlife merely redefines "death". 01:01:40 It's not an afterlife, it's just life, stage 2. 01:01:57 So, to rephrase, you want to go into the next stage of life, which is an eternal utopia, i.e. no death. 01:02:11 Yes 01:02:16 We can see that this idea clearly does not require god, and is something that, theoretically, we can do. 01:02:33 The only theoretical barrier is entropy, and we'd have a few billion years to work that out. 01:02:48 So, basically, you don't really want an "afterlife"; that's a misnomer, and it doesn't require a god or death. 01:03:06 ehird, but it excludes those who have already died, before this human-made afterlife was built 01:03:07 hm... 01:03:29 :O 01:03:31 -!- ais523 has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 01:03:56 Sgeo: If they could possibly partake in it, they are not dead. 01:04:11 You don't seem to understand: dead people don't exist. If there is an afterlife, then "death" isn't. 01:04:55 In my previous statement, by "dead", I meant "dead according to people who are no longer alive in the sense that we currently understand" 01:05:02 uh-huh 01:05:07 Or some other definition that should be um, understandable 01:06:12 Meh. Entertaining such a concept not only goes against Occam's razor and the scientific method, it diverts attention away from "we need to stop people dying". 01:07:45 It's ok to die. In fact, everybody should die. *Presses bu...* Aw... it broke! 01:08:01 phew 01:08:13 →→→→→ONWARD→→→→→→→→TO THE BRB STATION→→→→→ 01:09:58 -!- Cerise has changed nick to Jerry. 01:10:49 -!- Jerry has changed nick to Cerise. 01:21:16 ← 01:21:18 bakk 01:21:26 pikhq: Any luck with, I forgot what you were doing? 01:22:28 methinks dropbear is good 01:22:47 hmm, no sftp in dropbear though 01:39:13 Ah, you can use OpenSSH's sftp server with dropbear, it seems. 01:45:36 hmm 01:53:00 pikhq: Could use http://tools.suckless.org/9base as my slightly-less-core utils! :-P 01:53:05 (But naw) 02:03:04 -!- Kalagar has joined. 02:03:38 -!- Oranjer1 has joined. 02:06:43 -!- ehiird has joined. 02:06:48 test 02:06:58 hii there 02:07:01 Hi. 02:07:09 hello 02:07:46 Quite so. 02:08:14 and how! 02:08:14 ACTION tests 02:08:22 * ehird tests 02:08:35 * oerjan toasts 02:08:46 that show up as "* ehiird test" for anyone else? (the ehiird one) 02:09:00 nope 02:09:04 missing an s 02:09:05 no 02:09:10 * Kalagar scoffs 02:09:18 I see it as ACTION tests 02:09:33 * ehiird tests again 02:09:38 yay! 02:09:54 ehiird: i saw * ehiird .* both times, though :P 02:10:07 -!- Oranjer has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 02:10:18 Even for the * ehird tests one? 02:10:23 YOU ARE A HALLUCINATORY MAN, OERJAN 02:10:33 no, that was not one of them 02:10:44 So, anyway, I'm talking via the filesystem-based IRC client ii! And vim with some mappings to send. 02:10:49 both implies 2, you know. 02:11:04 It's quite pleasant, although I could do with a tiling window manager to avoid these big terminal windows. 02:11:32 Also, it displays actions as (inverted .)ACTION foo(inverted .), so I should probably use sed to mangle them into something nicer. 02:12:13 My bindings: we appends to irc.freenode.net/#esoteric/in then does dd (erase line, non-vimites). In insert mode, /me expands to ^AACTION^A. 02:12:25 Specifically, ACTIONOD 02:12:41 Erm. That character before OD is escape (^[). 02:12:49 uh-huh 02:13:03 So, when I type /me, it actually expands in front of my eyes. :P 02:13:18 ehiird: fuse? 02:13:26 I should make it trigger on /me, probably. 02:13:34 coppro: Nope. Just good old regular files. Put it in tmpfs if you want. 02:13:40 I think it doubles up as a logger this way. 02:14:08 ehiird: oh, so it's just a file-monitoring system? lame 02:14:17 It's not lame, it's usable. 02:14:46 I should probably have another sed script that does s/ehird/ehird\007/, but eh. 02:15:01 (And some provisions for not doing that to my own messages; easy enough.) 02:15:22 * ehiird thinks this is actually pretty usable 02:16:33 ehird: No luck. 02:16:39 -!- Oranjer1 has changed nick to Oranjer. 02:16:44 With what? 02:16:53 * coppro should make a fuse client 02:17:16 coppro: This has the marked advantage that your logs ARE the IRC window. 02:17:26 NetBSD coreutils. Or asmutils, for that matter. 02:17:29 Physical files, bitch! We need a revolution in non-virtual filesystems. :P 02:17:36 pikhq: Aw. 02:17:48 Argh, this is ridiculously comfortable even in its barebones state. 02:17:50 -!- ehird has quit. 02:18:07 "If you want to know more, you can take the Online option for your afterlife, and you will have all the info you can possibly want about the real world." 02:18:08 Goodbye, Colloquy! 02:18:11 I think that biases things 02:18:19 No, it doesn't. 02:18:34 It started me thinking "Online" before I ever saw the choices 02:18:47 Because you're a futurist immortalist, probably. 02:19:03 The fact that it seems obvious is b asically just an indicator of your rationality. 02:19:06 *basically 02:19:11 ehiird: fuse would allow creative things like every user having access 02:19:25 coppro: Elaborate. Isn't that just a+w? 02:19:48 ehiird: No. Fuse allows you to discriminate on a per-user basis 02:19:51 Woo! I love this client! 02:19:56 coppro: So what? 02:20:06 so you could make it so that it maintains multiple connections; one per user accessing it 02:20:18 This is simpler, works as a logger, and is easier to set up. Woo physical files! 02:20:24 coppro: That's called "multiple ii processes". 02:20:38 ehiird: ah, but you can't use the same directory, can you? 02:20:58 No, which is good because they're different things... 02:21:04 (I assume you've picked the sane implementation of having a directory for the server, and a file per channel 02:21:12 Filesystem = namespace = disambiguator. 02:21:17 No. 02:21:34 server/channel/{in,out}. Also server/{in,out} and server/nick/{in,out}. 02:21:39 ii isn't mine, btw. It's by the suckless folks. 02:22:19 in/out is better because you can use tail and editors and shit without filtering, plus it's less magical. 02:22:39 oh 02:22:42 it's not by you 02:22:43 :( 02:22:52 Why's that a bad thing? :P 02:23:10 things are more awesome when written by someone in here 02:23:21 -!- FireFly has quit ("Later"). 02:23:42 Then you'll luuuuuuuurve my Linux distro, presumably. 02:23:58 "(leaving out the hell and annihilation options, for obvious reasons)" I didn't even see that the first time 02:24:07 By the way, is ehird still in here? I didn't get notification of its departing, but I quit Colloquy. 02:24:24 `addquote things are more awesome when written by someone in here 02:24:36 99| things are more awesome when written by someone in here 02:24:43 `quote 02:24:45 -!- BeholdMyGlory has quit (Remote closed the connection). 02:24:53 23| Finally I have found some actually useful purpose for it. 02:25:12 impossible 02:25:13 Did that lag for anyone else? 02:25:18 fungot has no purpose 02:25:18 coppro: you! take! we find! the masamune!!! 02:25:32 ehiird: yes 02:25:40 ^style 02:25:40 Available: agora alice c64 ct* darwin discworld europarl ff7 fisher ic irc jargon lovecraft nethack pa speeches ss wp youtube 02:25:45 (Also: Guys you totally should use my Linux distro when it's ready! It's grrrrrrrreat! Like Frosties.) 02:25:50 how do I get the current style? 02:25:55 You just did. 02:26:01 ^style agora 02:26:02 Selected style: agora (a large selection of Agora rules, both current and historical) 02:26:03 ^style 02:26:04 Available: agora* alice c64 ct darwin discworld europarl ff7 fisher ic irc jargon lovecraft nethack pa speeches ss wp youtube 02:26:07 oh 02:26:11 ^style ct 02:26:13 like this? 02:26:13 multi-line messages 02:26:13 Selected style: ct (Chrono Trigger game script) 02:26:13 Hey, can I do 02:26:15 Oh. 02:26:19 oohh no wonder 02:26:22 My "we" just sends one line. 02:26:30 I SHOULD FIX THAT 02:27:05 Test. 02:27:13 test 02:27:13 a 02:27:25 Okay, so I just need to fix deleting and hey presto. 02:27:51 Oh, and if I enable hard wrapping at ~500cols... 02:28:30 Any clever vim users here? What's the best way to delete the whole file's contents? 02:29:14 :%d 02:29:36 Clever and obvious; why didn't I think of that? 02:29:50 (Probably because I somehow forgot what % did to :s at some point in time and never looked it up...) 02:30:16 So now, I can just put stuff like this in the buffer: 02:30:16 int main() { 02:30:16 return 0; 02:30:16 } 02:30:16 ...and it just works! 02:31:07 someone pooped on ehiird 02:31:31 They did? 02:31:36 Why wasn't I informed of this development? 02:33:44 bsmntbombdood: Eh?! Eh?! 02:33:45 :-P 02:37:37 `quote 02:37:43 Why is HackEgo so slow? 02:37:48 39| I'm a furry 02:37:56 Oh. Is that why? 02:38:11 -!- Oranjer1 has joined. 02:38:20 Hi Oranjer1. 02:38:24 Do you have a goatee? 02:39:53 maybe 02:40:07 Evil twin! 02:40:29 :O 02:40:44 but Oranjer0 doesn't exist anymore 02:40:48 I've superceded him 02:40:55 It's true; I saw it on Star Trek. 02:41:00 Wait, is Oranjer still in here? Is ehird? 02:41:03 I know 02:41:12 I think ii isn't showing /parts; how strange. 02:41:19 anyway, I'm busy watching I Heart Huckabees 02:41:25 what 02:41:38 Yeah, well, I Heart YOUR MOM. 02:41:41 what 02:41:41 see ya later 02:41:44 uh-huh 02:41:48 buh-bye 02:41:49 See ya FACER 02:42:36 -!- ehiird has changed nick to mes. 02:44:06 * mes downloads splitvt to try and unify these two windows 02:44:19 wait, what? why am I mes 02:44:29 oh, hm. ah. 02:44:42 "/names"; a is dropped as the presumable space char, /n = change nick 02:44:45 -!- mes has changed nick to ehird. 02:44:47 tada 02:56:57 coppro: another reason real files are awesome -- put it on nfs 02:57:02 Voila, IRC bouncer. 02:57:07 :D 02:57:10 OH! I JUST BLEW YOUR FUSE! 02:57:38 that's... actually a really good idea 02:57:42 ehird: can't you NFS a fuse partition? 02:57:47 s/partition/mount/ 02:57:50 -!- Oranjer has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 02:58:02 Well, possibly. I wouldn't want to try. 02:58:10 :P 02:58:23 It is a good idea, though, isn't it. 02:58:40 maybe 02:58:47 -!- coppro has quit (Remote closed the connection). 02:59:15 Also, setting up screen for this is a beeeeeeeeyotch. 03:05:09 Rheet. 03:05:14 Hmm, 'sit broken? 03:05:35 #!/bin/sh 03:05:36 tail -f out | 03:05:36 while read line; do 03:05:36 if echo $line | cut -f4- -d" " | grep -i rhe+t >/dev/null; then 03:05:36 echo "Ding!" 03:05:36 fi 03:05:38 done >in 03:05:40 Don't see why it shouldn't work. 03:05:42 Ding! 03:06:02 * ehird modifies that to rhe{2,}t, anyway 03:06:40 Ding! 03:06:46 Heh; that's it picking it up from the logs. Rheeeeet. 03:06:54 wat 03:07:14 Ding! 03:07:14 test 03:07:23 Okay, so it's picking up lines. 03:08:43 Hope this doesn't spam... 03:08:45 Ding! 03:08:46 Ding! 03:08:46 Ding! 03:08:46 Ding! 03:08:46 Ding! 03:08:46 Ding! 03:08:48 Ding! 03:08:50 Ding! 03:08:52 Ding! 03:08:54 Ding! 03:08:56 Ding! 03:08:58 Ding! 03:09:00 Ding! 03:09:02 Ding! 03:09:04 Ding! 03:09:06 Ding! 03:09:08 Ding! 03:09:10 Ding! 03:09:12 Ding! 03:09:14 Ding! 03:09:16 Ding! 03:09:18 Ding! 03:09:22 Ding! 03:09:22 Ding! 03:09:26 Ding! 03:09:26 Ding! 03:09:27 piping yes 'Ding!' to irc is generally considered rude, ehird 03:09:28 Ding! 03:09:30 Ding! 03:09:32 Ding! 03:09:34 Ding! 03:09:36 Ding! 03:09:38 Ding! 03:09:40 Ding! 03:09:42 Ding! 03:09:44 Ding! 03:09:46 Ding! 03:09:48 Ding! 03:09:50 Ding! 03:09:52 Ding! 03:09:54 Ding! 03:09:56 Ding! 03:09:58 Ding! 03:10:02 Ding! 03:10:02 Ding! 03:10:04 Oh my life. 03:10:06 I didn't do that! >_< 03:10:08 Also, I can't stop it >_< 03:10:10 It should give up... sometime... 03:10:19 YAY 03:11:45 test 03:12:07 * Sgeo once piped yes to someone's terminal 03:12:13 test 03:12:15 test a b c 03:12:16 After they were writing to me while I was in emacs 03:12:19 okay, that works 03:12:31 abc 03:12:33 rheet 03:12:36 Rheet 03:12:40 rheeet 03:12:41 rhet 03:12:54 Motherfuck-- ohhhh. Ohh. 03:13:10 Fuck grep with a rake. 03:13:32 No thanks. You might like that, but I don't. 03:13:39 Or do you?! Rheet! 03:13:44 FUCKING! 03:13:47 >_< 03:13:52 rheet 03:13:52 rheeet 03:13:58 WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM ME, GREP? 03:14:09 butts? 03:14:13 rheet? 03:14:15 Oh. 03:14:34 I think I fixed it. 03:14:34 Rheet. 03:14:46 WHY OH WHY 03:15:36 rheet 03:15:47 Mother-fucking-fucker-shitty-scripting-shelling-iiing-thing-ARGH 03:16:51 Abc 03:16:53 Rheet 03:16:55 rheet 03:17:01 I think my grep is broken or something 03:17:08 * ehird bangs head against wall. This is annoying. 03:17:21 Okay. Test. 03:17:59 Rheet. 03:18:03 rheet 03:19:33 There. 03:19:34 Rheet. 03:19:34 Ding! 03:19:36 :D 03:20:12 So, I was going to call this an example of how awesomely easy it is to script ii, but that might be seen as disingeneous in light of recent events! However, that was grep's fault (+ needs to be \+; sigh). 03:20:29 #!/bin/sh 03:20:29 tail -n 0 -f out | 03:20:29 while read line; do 03:20:29 if echo $line | cut -f4- -d" " | grep -i 'rhee\+t' >/dev/null; then 03:20:29 echo "Ding!" >in 03:20:30 fi 03:20:32 done 03:20:34 It does the obvious. 03:20:48 You can do a nc -e style affair by putting >in after the done. 03:21:01 rheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet 03:21:02 Ding! 03:21:07 rhet 03:21:09 rheet 03:21:09 Ding! 03:21:13 rheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet 03:21:13 Ding! 03:22:15 Not ii's fault you don't know how to use grep 03:22:17 (j/k) 03:22:22 -!- mad has joined. 03:22:29 It's grep's fault its regexp format is so retarded. :P 03:22:37 s/fault/fault that/, I guess. 03:22:50 Oh, and watch as I forward a channel to another channel! 03:23:34 2009-10-29 02:23 -!- ehird(n=ehiird@91.105.101.218) has joined #esoteric-blah 03:23:34 2009-10-29 02:23 -!- ChanServ changed mode/#esoteric-blah -> -s+tc-o ehird 03:23:47 2009-10-29 02:23 rheet 03:23:47 Ding! 03:23:55 (My rheet-script only executes in here. Go on, join #esoteric-blah and try it. :P) 03:23:55 Ding! 03:24:02 * Sgeo did that once. Forwarded chat between Sine and a channel on another network. Spammed the other channel into an active channel that happened to be named SGEO. Guess where Sgeo can't go. 03:24:10 2009-10-29 02:24 -!- Sgeo(n=Sgeo@ool-18bf618a.dyn.optonline.net) has joined #esoteric-blah 03:24:12 2009-10-29 02:24 Hm 03:24:21 I've killed the rheet-script since it got annoying. 03:24:44 Here's how I did this, incidentally: [~/irc/irc.freenode.net/#esoteric-blah]$ tail -f out >../#esoteric/in 03:24:51 Very simple. 03:25:10 * Sgeo should probably be eating 03:25:17 not >> ? 03:25:30 oerjan: Nope; in is magical. 03:25:39 It sucks up anything you give it and immediately blanks out. 03:25:47 It's basically like /dev/null but with side-effects. 03:26:44 -!- ehird has changed nick to YourMom. 03:26:48 mhm 03:26:51 * YourMom should be eating! 03:27:10 2009-10-29 02:27 ACTION concurs! 03:27:10 why is dram so complicated 03:27:18 Because I am so complicated. 03:27:18 I'd say something to that, but it would probably be offensive 03:27:25 -!- YourMom has changed nick to ehird. 03:27:30 Even though really I'm the only person who'd be offended. 03:27:31 Sgeo: I postulate that I cannot be offended! 03:28:24 I.. I can't even write a response, because it would be inappropriate 03:28:41 YOU'RE AS SPEECHLESS AS YOUR MOTHER IN BED LAST NIGHT 03:29:08 My mom's been dead since 2004. 03:29:15 ouch :| 03:29:17 sry 03:29:26 thanks 03:29:47 hey, you never said sorry to _me_... 03:30:07 oerjan, what's happened in your life? If I may ask 03:30:19 Nobody cares about oerjan! Well FINE, sorry. 03:30:38 Sheesh, emotions, you'd think someone died! Okay I'll shut up now 03:30:44 you may ask. i don't feel like answering, though. 03:31:10 * oerjan swats ehird -----### 03:31:17 * ehird dies 03:31:45 it occurs to me that i _might_ be sending some mixed signals here 03:31:55 THIS IS POSSIBLE 03:32:07 but then i am MAD, so... 03:32:27 2009-10-29 02:32 oerjan is such an idiot, going on about how he's mad in #esoteric? Isn't that right, guys?! 03:32:29 Whoops. 03:32:38 -!- mad has changed nick to madbrain. 03:32:41 2009-10-29 02:32 *#esoteric. 03:32:47 Whoops! 03:33:28 mutually assured destruction, that's me 03:33:35 * oerjan swats ehird again -----### 03:34:56 I actually said that #esoteric-blah :-P 03:50:06 coppro: also 03:50:29 Let's say you have some (s)ftp somewhere, but can't run your own programs on that server 03:50:41 Mount it with sshfs or something, run ii on your home computer, and leave it on 03:50:59 IRC bouncer with just internet-accessible storage and a left-on computer! 03:51:21 Well. I'm not sure if file change notification works over SFTP... 03:51:25 -!- coppro has joined. 03:51:28 But it's fun in theory! 03:51:32 Oh, you weren't here. 03:51:40 2009-10-29 02:50 coppro: also 03:51:40 2009-10-29 02:50 Let's say you have some (s)ftp somewhere, but can't run 03:51:40 your own programs on that server 03:51:40 2009-10-29 02:50 Mount it with sshfs or something, run ii on your home c 03:51:40 omputer, and leave it on 03:51:41 2009-10-29 02:50 IRC bouncer with just internet-accessible storage and a 03:51:43 left-on computer! 03:51:45 2009-10-29 02:51 Well. I'm not sure if file change notification works ov 03:51:47 er SFTP... 03:51:49 2009-10-29 02:51 -!- coppro(n=coppro@unaffiliated/coppro) has joined #esoteric 03:51:51 2009-10-29 02:51 But it's fun in theory! 03:52:37 wait, what? 03:52:48 Wait, what do you mean by "wait, what?"? 03:53:18 2009-10-29 02:51 -!- coppro(n=coppro@unaffiliated/coppro) has joined #esoteric 03:53:28 Did this not, in fact, happen? 03:53:45 19:51:21 Well. I'm not sure if file change notification works over SFTP... 03:53:46 19:51:25 --- join: coppro (n=coppro@unaffiliated/coppro) joined #esoteric 03:53:46 19:51:28 But it's fun in theory! 03:53:46 It sure did, says clog. 03:53:48 yes, but (1) why did you echo it (2) are you this lagged? 03:53:55 ehird: ah, I see. Neat 03:54:07 I echoed it because I copied-and-pasted what I said to him, thinking he was here. 03:54:09 ok you are this lagged 03:54:16 I am not lagged. 03:54:18 oh 03:54:47 coppro: Of course, I don't think you can get file change notifications over SFTP, and doing "tail -f" will be hard... 03:56:15 Still, it's cute. :) 03:56:44 ehird: use an FTP fuse module :P 03:57:02 Yes, but wouldn't "tail -f" on that consist of bombarding the FTP server? :-P 03:57:29 probably 03:57:45 DOSfs 03:57:59 You mean... FAT? 03:58:07 no, you're fat 03:58:21 no, not _that_ DOS 03:58:30 Oh. >_< 03:58:39 Don't you mean File Allocation Table? 03:59:10 Fat Allocation Table 03:59:13 stfu we use tlas here 03:59:48 Oh god, recursive acronym... 04:00:06 SFU, you mean. 04:00:16 Who's Kalagar, anyway? 04:00:56 Dunno, actually. I just found #IRP somewhere, but it's rather quiet there 04:01:27 You... don't know who you are 04:01:29 I'm scared 04:01:34 Kalagar 04:01:36 -!- Oranjer1 has changed nick to Oranjer. 04:02:44 Magic. 04:02:55 fax, nice one 04:03:39 Now, now avoid endless repeats... 04:04:15 Why? Why? Wh-- etc. 04:04:18 ehird has been having trouble with that lately 04:06:52 Indeed he has 04:09:13 goddamn 04:09:18 #IRP is looping 04:09:28 Slowly, but looping indeed 04:09:38 fax tried to break the loop 04:09:56 * ehird watches 04:10:01 Anyone want to give some context? 04:15:05 -!- ehird has quit (Remote closed the connection). 04:15:24 -!- ehiird has joined. 04:15:33 Yep, it does indeed work as a log 04:15:44 My brain just broke 04:16:30 what 04:16:33 what 04:16:36 fungot 04:16:42 fungot, ^styple 04:16:44 fax: from where does the hero alone have the power. " m, madam...! i am the master of war! i've seen all kinds of battles from here, step back, prometheus! 04:16:44 fax: we must do it to save you! who the heck are you?! c'mon!!! the monster who kidnapped the princess to the castle! and letting these...hoodlums in here? traitors like you deserve from heckran! ha! 04:17:20 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 04:17:31 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 04:19:20 -!- fax has quit ("Leaving"). 04:19:37 nooo fax 04:19:49 oh, wait, you were apparently trolling 04:20:03 your mom was trolling. 04:20:26 :O 04:20:35 your troll is my...mom? oh, wait 04:27:52 I see what you did there 04:45:09 Whoa, http://w3.org/ was redesigned. 04:45:37 -!- Kalagar has quit. 04:52:04 I do not like the new design 04:52:10 I do. 04:59:47 awwwww 05:05:57 RABBITS 05:06:08 -!- Oranjer has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 05:07:39 -!- Oranjer has joined. 05:08:07 -!- oerjan has quit ("Good night"). 05:09:21 -!- Azstal has joined. 05:15:52 I really like this IRC client. 05:17:32 uh-huh 05:22:06 -!- Asztal^_^ has joined. 05:22:18 "Table ^_^" 05:23:38 -!- Asztal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 05:23:47 -!- Asztal^_^ has changed nick to Asztal. 05:29:48 I turned into a spear for a year. 05:30:09 -!- Azstal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 05:36:17 Yes, the kind of table or desk that you sit at, not the one with rows and columns. 05:36:53 Hyuk hyuk hyuk. 05:38:28 ...what? 05:38:59 It's what my name means. 05:39:09 oh, okay 05:39:18 In Hungarian. 05:39:23 oooh 05:39:30 I was starting to learn Hungarian at the time, so I chose a word I'd just learnt :) 05:41:08 Do you know it now? 05:41:13 oh 05:41:29 yep! 05:41:48 -!- madbrain has quit ("Radiateur"). 05:41:48 I mean Asztal. 05:41:55 (Oranjer: you know Hungarian?) 05:42:01 (or did you mean, now you know the name) 05:42:30 I now know the..name? 05:43:20 ehiird: I know it to some extent, but for some unfathomable reason¹ I haven't had much excuse to use it 05:43:22 Like: 05:43:22 "I don't get it." 05:43:22 "It's blah. Know it now?" 05:43:22 "yep!" 05:43:22 Contrived, admittedly, but your confusion previously threw me off; if you knew Hungarian, surely you wouldn't be confused, as you'd see that Asztal means table. 05:43:38 And I can't think of any other options. 05:44:00 -!- Gracenotes has joined. 05:44:10 Asztal: Some unfathomable reason to the power of one? 05:44:13 uh-huh 05:44:29 he cribbed "unfathomable reason" from wikipedia? 05:45:07 What? 05:45:13 ehiird: Oh, forgot my footnote... ¹ Nobody else uses it. :( 05:45:24 Oh. 05:45:31 Also, I'm pretty sure... Hungarians use it. 05:45:35 ha! 05:45:35 Just sayin' 05:48:14 [Asztal sat silently, stunned at this revelation.] 05:48:32 :O 05:48:51 WTF is a Hungarian? 05:49:14 I'm just going to assume (hope beyond hope) that that was a joke. 05:49:52 haha 05:52:14 Please confirm it, Asztal, or I fear I wil not be able to sleep! :P 05:52:20 haha 05:52:24 *will 05:53:49 You sleep? 05:54:31 I wish I didn't have to, and I'm considering Uberman. But yes, I do in fact sleep. And I have to be up at like 9-10. 05:54:39 I can confirm that I know what a Hungarian is, though. 05:54:52 Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ^_________________________^ 05:54:53 I would try Uberma if I didn't have a schedule to follow 05:55:01 that's too happy 05:55:11 and that smilie is a bit too anime 05:55:28 I also have to be up around that time... but I can't sleep because I just made GHC panic on my code :( 05:55:32 coppro: try Tesla. It was invented as a more hardcore Uberman ... that fits in with schooling. http://tesser.org/sleep/teslapattern/ 05:55:58 "Use only after a period of Uberman. Do not use while pregnant. No warranty. Your mileage will vary. Please don't sue us." 05:59:20 Anyway, I'm reluctant to try the hardcore polyphasic schedules (Uberman, Dymaxion, Tesla) because they haven't really been studied and I'm still developing... but then again, they must beat my fucked-up monophasic schedule. 05:59:50 yeah, mine's pretty messed up 06:00:00 I've been thinking of trying to switch to a diphasic schedule 06:00:05 :O 06:00:07 Biphasic, you mean? 06:00:11 whatever 06:00:14 i.e. siesta nap. 06:00:15 a couple hours in the morning, a couple in the evening 06:00:26 That is not known to work. 06:00:52 A long (like 5-6 hours) night sleep and a midday nap is "natural", though. 06:01:19 I wouldn't recommend what you said, though. I don't think it would work. 06:01:27 why not? 06:01:37 based on my experiences, I think it would 06:01:44 For instance http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2006/10/05/charts-of-types-of-polyphasic-schedules/ says "biphasic (note: feasibility under dispute, though "traditional biphasic", which involves one long sleep and one long "siesta" nap, is well known to work and be beneficial.)" 06:01:53 and matches your description (2 sleeps of 2-4 hours each) 06:02:10 Puredoxyk named and pioneered the Uberman schedule, so she's a credible source. 06:02:13 -!- Oranjer has left (?). 06:02:17 And that articcle may be circa 2006, but it's still worth considering. 06:02:20 *article 06:02:28 I've certainly never heard of anyone doing such a schedule. 06:03:11 I think it would be closer to your siesta nap schedule you described 06:03:27 Siestas have to be done at midday; it's what the circadian rhythm does. 06:03:36 It's why you're a little sleepy at midday. 06:03:44 (when doing normal monophasic) 06:03:56 see, that's where mine would differ 06:04:09 it would be about 2-7 am and then maybe 4-7 pm 06:04:20 and then I'd see if I could shrink it 06:04:23 Yes, the problem is that you can't just make shit up and expect your body to be happy. 06:04:42 ehiird: this is based on my experiences when I ran my monophasic schedule into the ground 06:04:52 With a really-hardcore, who-the-fuck-knows-how-it-works schedule like Uberman, your body adjusts because otherwise it's gonna die. 06:04:58 Otherwise? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Biological_clock_human.PNG 06:05:05 You are its bitch; design around it. 06:05:16 Note the total absensce of anything around noon. That's why siestas work. 06:05:25 I ended up sleeping like that for about a day, and it felt great; not sure about the long-term effects 06:05:47 Basing your theory on a day? Yeah, not gonna work. Too many variables from the previous day. 06:06:10 ehiird: it felt like it would work 06:06:24 ehiird: you're right that I can't know for sure 06:06:26 * ehiird bashes head against a brick wall 06:06:37 You slept one way for one day while you were self-admittedly on a fucked up schedule. 06:06:56 Basing on the fact that it "felt like it would work", and going against the circadian rhythm, you think you should adopt it. 06:07:00 Come on, that's just stupid. 06:07:23 ehiird: people are irrational creatures 06:07:29 it's a fact of how our brains work 06:07:55 ...did you just defend your proposed adoption by admitting it's irrational? 06:08:10 Yes, at the lower levels we are rational, however if you're reasoning about it irrationality is your fault. 06:08:14 *we are irrational 06:10:24 ehiird: no. I'm trying to defend myself in a way that will cause you to realize that it's the sort of feeling that says 06:10:32 "I'm right about this" 06:11:13 You are an idiot if you seriously believe in such feelings and ignore all rational argument. Delusional in the highest order. 06:11:48 Those "feelings" are worth nothing; believing them without any other input is ridiculous enough, believing them when rational counterargument is presented is simply insane. 06:15:13 ehiird: I'd believe you in normal circumstances, but when it has to do with my own body, I trust my body to give me the feelings that allow me to make the best choice 06:15:23 * ehiird facepalms 06:15:48 -!- Sgeo has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 06:15:49 also, there is no rational counterargument 06:15:58 I knew there were people this delusional, but I didn't know that the kind of crowd #esoteric attracts included them. 06:16:01 coppro: what 06:16:07 how on earth is there no rational counterargument 06:16:23 because your body's TOTALLY-ZOMG-RIGHT feelings are the very mediator of the fabric of truth? 06:17:45 coppro: Science FTW. 06:17:51 ehiird: your argument consists of two things: #1 is the circadian cycle. #2 is that there is no record of anyone doing this before. The first is already demonstrably mutable, but your assertion that the hardcore cycles work by forcing your body to adapt is mere speculation 06:18:05 SCIENCE? There is no rational counterargument, pikhq. 06:18:05 He has a FEELING 06:18:22 coppro: It's mere speculation backed up by the fact that, you know, otherwise they wouldn't have the same effects and would fail horribly 06:18:45 The second is a more plausible counterargument, however, it is not a proof 06:18:54 And the effects experienced while adjustment, and the commentary on them by adjusters, universally reflects the body going "ok, this isn't gonna end any time soon; and i'm dying, so, better adjust" 06:18:55 A couple hours in the morning, a couple in the evening? I highly doubt that that'd work. 06:18:59 ehiird: trust me. I'm very good at pretending that speculation is fact 06:19:05 coppro: Guess what? Burden of proof, bitch! 06:19:07 However, if you really think that it would work, I encourage you *to try it*.] 06:19:13 Yeah, my counteragrument isn't a PROOF. 06:19:22 But you don't even have ANY evidence. 06:19:24 Let us know how it works -- the results should be interesting regardless of whether or not it works. 06:19:26 -- and no, your "feeling" does not even count as speculattion. 06:19:30 *speculation 06:19:52 Otherwise I'd be going around trying to disprove every god because its followers all have feelings that it's true, oh so strong feelings at that, stronger than whatever feeling you had. 06:20:00 No, it wasn't just a hunch. 06:20:14 True, it was a MYSTIC INTERLINKED-CONSCIOUSNESS WAVELENGTH FEELING. 06:20:18 lol 06:20:32 ehiird, the boy who doesn't follow his feelings 06:20:43 ............ 06:20:56 "Oh dear, I appear to be extremely ill to the stomach today. Oh well, up and to school!" 06:21:07 you just managed to accuse not ignoring rationality in the face of "feelings" as a bad, ridiculous thing 06:21:14 are you religious, coppro? 06:21:19 because you're certainly delusional enough. 06:22:08 ehiird: would you like me to flame you back? 06:22:29 no, it would almost certainly have no connection to reality as clearly your thought methodology doesn't. 06:23:12 ehiird: Given that was another flame, I will take it as an invitation to respond, particularly in light of the number of times you've flamed me when we've disagreed. Even when I was right. 06:23:49 congrats, you also managed to paint me as someone orchestrating a campaign of flames against your beautiful rightness 06:24:02 ehiird: I never said I was right all the time. 06:24:16 you're crazy, and i mean this in a very literal, non-insulting way. 06:24:40 i do like how apparently i can't state facts about your thought methodology without them being flames, though. 06:24:54 crime scene, do not cross, all arguments invalid 06:26:49 You are an immature child who pretends to be all-knowing but isn't, and you hide your ignorance by demeaning other people when you disagree with them. You hide behind your ability to ignore any issues that you don't understand, and use insults to cover this fact up. You use insults to cover up for your inability to understand and properly refute the argument presented against you. Then, when... 06:26:50 ...you do find an area of knowledge in which you are more knowledgeable than the other party, you capitalize on it, further deriding your opponent for not knowing whatever random fact it is you happen to know. 06:28:40 like so many other things you have said in the past minutes, that would be an excellent statement if only it had any connection to reality; for instance, your mind has completely painted an illusory sense of all-knowing on me. 06:28:55 i would rebut it, but it is hard to rebut something which is based on premises that are simply false. 06:29:57 also, by deriding do you mean using in argument? because yeah. i do use facts i know to rebut other things. shocking. i'm such a horrible child. call the presses 06:30:27 i would also like to note that you're a hypocrite; noting that i am indeed not an adult -- i.e., I am a child -- is merely ad hominem 06:31:03 i am a minor and so are you. i'm also over the age of 13, so there's no boundary between us age-wise. so even your ad hominem fails horribly 06:32:25 in conclusion, you've often demonstrated that you have some kind of problem with me and view me as a sort of ad hominem generator that never makes any real arguments, and so this is nothing new. it is also completely imagined, and you would do well to try and remove from your mind this crazy delusional caricature of me. 06:32:51 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDW0ZnZxjn4 06:34:49 -!- ehiird has quit (Remote closed the connection). 06:36:27 -!- ehiird has joined. 06:36:27 coppro: oh, and I'm happy to interpret this flame as an invitation to not bother to enage in rational argument with you any more, as i only do that with people who aren't completely crazy. you may feel free to enjoy the replacement of this stream with more often pickings from the previously more rarely sourced /dev/flame, or execute an /ignore command in an input booth at your nearest convenience. 06:36:48 wonder why ii crashedw 06:36:58 s/w$// 06:38:28 -!- immibis has joined. 06:41:45 -!- immibis has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 06:52:41 -!- Azstal has joined. 06:57:46 singing diarrhea in the bulk of the sevenfold! 06:57:47 singing diarrhea in the bulk of the sevenfold! 06:57:47 singing diarrhea in the bulk of the sevenfold! 06:57:52 glio 06:57:58 eww 06:59:48 what 07:00:18 nowadays i sleep about 4 hours during the night, 4 hours during the day 07:00:33 what what? i didn't want your glio in my diarrhea i guess. 07:00:37 since you're inhuman you're not a datapoint 07:00:52 the glia are sacred for us meniculous lizards. 07:01:09 did i say meniculous? 07:01:12 indeed i did. 07:01:16 yes and i googled it 07:01:28 i was thinking i should do that too 07:01:37 but maybe i won't now that it's mainstream 07:01:37 the word fits! 07:01:43 lawl 07:02:49 okokokokokokokokokokokoko 07:02:58 i should get getting soon 07:03:06 i have this like total lecture 07:03:25 total lecture 07:03:41 yeah 07:05:46 it's about these things that you know they eat something, and they crap something out, and then you know they are consistent in their crapping patterns, the clinical term for said crapping condition is function 07:06:06 clinical futz 07:06:41 -!- Asztal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 07:07:06 i've always liked the crapping analogy 07:07:26 crapping futz 07:07:42 this is a very crappy morning i guess 07:09:20 also why do you have two ehiird 07:09:48 i was too lazy to type i's, so i just wrote e and pressed tab a few times 07:10:08 e is pretty close to the tab so it's basically a free fall 07:10:50 i really need to go i think, this is getting too complicated ~> 07:14:06 -!- immibis has joined. 07:15:15 -!- iamcal has joined. 07:17:29 -!- ehiird has quit (Read error: 148 (No route to host)). 07:17:41 -!- Azstal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:59:05 -!- immibis has quit (Remote closed the connection). 09:22:51 -!- lament has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 09:23:04 -!- kar8nga has joined. 09:24:48 -!- lament has joined. 09:34:51 -!- ais523 has joined. 09:43:10 -!- ais523 has quit. 09:43:22 -!- ais523 has joined. 09:43:37 -!- Cerise has changed nick to Jerry. 09:43:58 -!- Jerry has changed nick to Cerise. 09:51:16 -!- Cerise has changed nick to Jerry. 09:52:18 -!- Jerry has changed nick to Cerise. 10:49:19 -!- Cerise has changed nick to Jerry. 10:49:29 -!- Jerry has changed nick to Cerise. 10:56:08 hi ais523 10:56:18 hi 10:58:22 /*** end of main.c ***/ 10:58:22 hm 10:58:30 what is the point of that 10:59:40 so that you can cat all the files together and send it in an email and it's clear which is which 11:00:22 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 11:00:33 ais523, that would only make sense if every file had that 11:00:39 which is not the case 11:00:47 just two out of around 20 or so 11:00:48 oh, where I've seen that, every file /did/ have that 11:01:48 ais523, plus catting them together would be a bit strange. Oh and it wouldn't be very useful since there are both server/main.c and client/main.c (only the former has such a comment at the end btw) 11:02:07 and yeah it would be an insane way to distribute a program 11:02:25 This is what's wrong with Python. And //-based comments. 11:02:34 because you can't rely on the lines not to wrap 11:02:39 heh 11:02:44 nor the indentation to be preserved 11:02:50 ais523, wrapping in the middle of a C string would cause issues too. 11:03:08 that's what the "a" "b" syntax is for 11:03:12 or backslash-newline, fwiw 11:03:30 interesting fact: american sign language has two mechanisms for indicating negation, one of which can actually span the whole length of the negated object 11:03:53 btw wc -l claims a total of 138250 lines for all *.c and *.h 11:04:08 so, yeah that way to distribute it would be rather awkward. 11:04:24 yep, uuencoded gzip works better when it's about that long 11:04:42 but some purists apparently insist that things like Usenet distributions are human-readable 11:06:10 ais523, what about that yencode or whatever it was called 11:06:19 pretty sure I seen it somewhere on usenet 11:06:30 AnMaster: that's for sharing binaries, I think, rather than source 11:06:37 ais523, hm possibly 11:06:48 and it's banned by most newsgroups other than the alt.binaries hierarchy 11:07:25 ais523, was ages ago I last saw such a file, don't remember where 11:09:32 They call the encoding "yEnc", though I think the common tools were yencode/ydecode. 11:10:42 -!- MigoMipo has joined. 11:10:48 fizzie, ah possibly 11:11:37 * AnMaster ponders this (in a global include): 11:11:39 #ifndef DEBUG 11:11:39 #define DEBUG 11:11:39 #endif 11:11:42 interesting 11:11:56 so basically, DEBUG is pointless 11:46:33 -!- Asztal has joined. 11:57:42 -!- puzzlet has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 11:57:57 -!- puzzlet has joined. 12:01:51 -!- MigoMipo has quit (Ping timeout: 180 seconds). 12:08:43 -!- MigoMipo has joined. 12:20:40 -!- MigoMipo has quit ("Page closed"). 12:48:49 -!- FireFly has joined. 12:57:57 -!- FireFly has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 13:05:16 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 13:21:34 -!- sebbu has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 13:36:39 -!- BeholdMyGlory has joined. 13:42:11 -!- Pthing has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 13:56:00 -!- MigoMipo has joined. 14:42:24 -!- augur has quit (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)). 15:34:55 -!- augur has joined. 15:43:06 -!- coppro has quit ("I am leaving. You are about to explode."). 15:52:40 AnMaster: sweet 16:00:32 olsner, as in "I actually ran across that in serious code" 16:01:30 AnMaster: obviously, it only works when DEBUG is defined 16:01:52 ais523, XD 16:02:16 that would be funnier still if it defined NDEBUG too 16:11:20 -!- Azstal has joined. 16:19:35 -!- Azstal has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 16:20:32 -!- Azstal has joined. 16:21:40 -!- Asztal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 16:21:42 -!- Azstal has changed nick to Asztal. 16:40:10 -!- Asztal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 16:40:37 -!- Asztal has joined. 16:41:25 -!- oerjan has joined. 16:59:25 And I can't think of any other options. 17:00:14 it could be an extremely obscure word in hungarian, because hungarians always sit on the floor. yeah, that must be it. 17:00:22 -!- MigoMipo has quit ("Page closed"). 17:18:14 oerjan, iwc 17:18:17 bbl food 17:21:28 AnMaster: so the resemblance they noted on the forum was not a coincidence... 17:34:20 -!- ais523 has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 17:36:53 -!- ais523 has joined. 17:45:22 oerjan, eh 17:45:33 oerjan, what resemblance? 17:45:37 * AnMaster never reads the forum 17:45:49 with ishmael 17:46:04 oerjan, is that name supposed to mean something? 17:46:26 * AnMaster can't place it 17:46:32 the ishmael that has been in the martian theme for years? 17:46:46 oerjan, oh right. He was named that. Right 17:46:48 * AnMaster forgot that 17:47:35 (the last line of today's comic is a reference to moby dick's ishmael, btw) 17:59:37 oerjan, I never read that book 17:59:49 planned to 18:00:01 me neither. well, maybe a few sections. 18:01:46 but that line is the most famous one in the book. also the first. 18:07:05 -!- oerjan has quit ("Later"). 18:28:48 -!- ais523 has quit (Remote closed the connection). 18:38:47 -!- FireFly has joined. 18:42:36 -!- kar8nga has joined. 18:48:39 -!- MigoMipo has joined. 19:05:34 -!- adam_d has joined. 19:12:19 -!- Gracenotes has quit (Remote closed the connection). 19:26:05 -!- fax has joined. 19:43:23 -!- FireFly has quit (Remote closed the connection). 19:57:11 * AnMaster considers the possibilities of obfuscation using only rules for quotes and backslash in shell 20:13:43 -!- MizardX has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 20:14:42 -!- MizardX has joined. 20:17:49 -!- MizardX has quit (Read error: 131 (Connection reset by peer)). 20:18:21 -!- MizardX has joined. 20:45:25 -!- Oranjer has joined. 20:49:03 :O 21:02:40 :O 21:02:50 hola augur 21:02:58 hey 21:03:00 sups 21:03:40 nothing muchs 21:03:43 *muches? 21:06:56 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Law 21:20:17 AnMaster: what's computation in swedish 21:20:28 oklopol, in what sense 21:22:50 in the mathematical sense i guess 21:23:10 still 21:26:21 computation = beräkning 21:26:51 cool! 21:27:04 compute/calculate = räkna 21:27:29 what does the "be" at the beginning of beräkning add to the meaning? 21:27:30 yeah 21:27:40 like, specifically? 21:27:41 kalkylering 21:27:48 Oranjer, eh? 21:27:53 not sure 21:28:14 the process of turning räkna into beräkning 21:28:35 what does the be- -(~a)ing add? 21:28:37 it's like: what does the "co" at the start of "computation" mean 21:28:40 afaik 21:28:43 oh, ha 21:28:48 Oranjer, or maybe not 21:29:17 well, com-pute-ate-tion, I think? 21:29:24 what of beräkning? 21:29:37 (computation: co-mputation, mputation being the act of doing it without co) 21:29:44 ha! 21:29:49 be-räk-ning 21:29:51 naughty naughty 21:29:56 oh, MizardX? 21:29:56 MizardX, no way 21:30:10 what does the be- do? 21:30:27 räk(a) = related to shrip (or is it prawn? I always mix them up in English) 21:30:46 "räk" from "räkna" 21:30:53 MizardX, well yeah 21:31:01 ning is making a noun of it in there 21:31:09 okay 21:31:13 the be-? 21:31:19 I'm not really sure 21:31:36 also, AnMaster, it's shrimp and prawns 21:31:38 MizardX: oh, i thought beräkning would be more like counting. 21:31:53 very well, I shall ask google 21:31:55 Oranjer, what is? 21:32:19 oklopol, no. definitely not 21:32:22 räk(a) = related to shrip (or is it prawn? I always mix them up in English) 21:32:30 *shrip --> shrimp 21:32:33 räkning = counting (v); bill (n) 21:32:33 Oranjer, it was a Swedish joke 21:32:38 oh, okay 21:32:39 hmm 21:32:41 right 21:32:42 :? 21:32:46 about räka == one of those "from sea but not fish thingies" 21:32:54 ahhh 21:35:32 "räkna" = calculate/count (verb). "beräkna" = to do a calculation (verb). "beräkning" = act of doing a calculation (noun) 21:35:48 ah, thanks! 21:36:16 Still not sure what "be-" adds to the meaning... 21:36:26 I am looking that up 21:37:12 http://www.svenskaakademien.se/web/Ordlista.aspx 21:37:15 I tried searching that 21:37:29 first for beräkning 21:37:32 then for be- 21:37:56 Oranjer, that is word *list* 21:38:01 I know 21:38:38 but if someone who knew swedish read the "be-" words, they may be able to see a pattern? I dunno? 21:40:28 mhm 21:40:28 Oranjer, why do you care so much? 21:40:48 Why wouldn't I care? 21:41:39 -!- FireFly has joined. 21:47:47 well, apparently "befattning" means "post" and "fattning" means "temper" 21:47:47 what 21:48:22 Oranjer, or "grip" 21:48:31 oh? 21:48:36 huh 21:48:41 oh and "beskriva" == "describe", "skriva" == "write" 21:48:48 ah! 21:48:53 what? 21:48:57 describe, scribe 21:48:57 I can't see any logic 21:49:03 scribe = write 21:49:38 I believe it must mean "this would be the object of this verb" 21:49:48 beräkning 21:49:53 "that which is calculated" 21:50:10 oh, wait 21:50:13 but the issue was "räkna" <-> "beräkna" (both verbs) 21:50:25 beräkna -- "that which is calculated" 21:50:30 no 21:50:35 no? 21:50:37 "to calculate" 21:50:42 hmm 21:50:44 while "räkna" would be "to count" 21:50:47 ah-ha! 21:50:49 not exactly but similar 21:51:03 hmmm 21:51:15 also, I shall repost what MizardX wrote 21:51:23 for my own convenience 21:51:25 err 21:51:28 that is spam 21:51:31 just use scrollback 21:51:37 scrollback? 21:51:51 ... 21:51:53 every time I have to copy the ä? 21:51:56 oh that 21:52:00 exactly 21:52:08 Oranjer, fix your keyboard? 21:52:13 heh 21:52:32 I can't do that, we have yet to implement my modifying keyboard idea 21:56:40 Oranjer, eh? 21:56:51 just change layout 21:56:56 ummm 21:57:03 I...can't do that? 21:57:50 Somehow "be-" strengthens the verb, giving it a wider or more intense meaning. räkna (count) -> beräkna (calculate); sitta (sit) -> besitta (posess, occupy) 21:58:44 -!- cal153 has joined. 21:58:57 ah, okay 21:59:01 that works for me! 21:59:19 -!- iamcal has quit (Read error: 148 (No route to host)). 22:04:57 heh, apparently "be-" in English also means intenstifier 22:05:06 http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/be-#English 22:09:20 fungot 22:09:20 Oranjer: i, myself, will bring an end to all. ghosts lurk in the ruins! the structural damage is severe. the tale? you see, the mammon machine! 22:09:34 wow, fungot, you got some ego on you 22:09:34 Oranjer: and you call yourself a frog, and ayla... i will not betray my friends! 22:09:39 haha 22:10:50 fungot, hm 22:10:51 AnMaster: we are looking, but well behaved! crono!!! 22:10:56 XD 22:11:00 that almost sounded dirty 22:11:15 -!- adarq has joined. 22:11:21 I thought it was like "I am biting my thumb, but not at you sir!" 22:12:25 Hmm... beadding "be-" to every verb. 22:12:56 -!- augur has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 22:12:57 Why would you bedo that? 22:13:05 also, would "would" becount? 22:13:31 bewould 22:14:21 I can't think of that as a verb... 22:14:31 err... 22:14:41 I becan't bethink of that as a verb... 22:16:11 More like an adverb. 22:17:01 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_modal_verb#Would 22:17:15 We apparently beclassify it as a modal verb 22:17:27 I bethink we beneed more quasimodal verbs 22:17:36 (In english, I mean) 22:17:54 -!- adarq has left (?). 22:18:25 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 22:19:23 sorry 22:19:29 fungot, what do you bethink? 22:19:29 Oranjer: that no one was allowed to use the crane, enter any two of these letters, a b y. but, i...i shall obtain the 2 figurines on this floor to fight the mother brain, yet! 22:19:40 okay 22:19:59 I bemust beadd two of those letters, a, b, and y. to what? 22:20:37 I give up, fungot, and I shall also stop adding "be-" to my verbs unless I find it appropriate 22:20:47 fungot??? 22:20:49 Oranjer: we are looking, but well behaved! crono!!! the monster who kidnapped the princess to the castle! 22:20:49 Oranjer: but, we are far outnumbered!!! the monster who kidnapped the princess to the castle! and letting these...hoodlums in here? traitors like you deserve from heckran! ha! 22:20:49 :( 22:26:58 hey everyone, anyone there? 22:27:04 ? 22:27:22 hey, what do you think of combining Consensus Decision Making and Conway's Law? 22:27:29 eh? 22:28:02 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Law 22:28:16 Oranjer, too busy to read atm. One line summary of both of them 22:28:22 oh, okay 22:28:25 (one line each= 22:28:27 s/=/)/ 22:28:34 Consensus decision-making is a group decision making process that not only seeks the agreement of most participants, but also the resolution or mitigation of minority objections. 22:28:54 ...organizations which design systems ... are constrained to produce designs which are copies of the communication structures of these organizations. 22:29:00 that's Conway's Law 22:29:07 the former sounds like the classical swedish model. Less so these days 22:29:13 heh 22:29:33 well, Consensus Decision Making has each member having the power of veto 22:30:21 ah that differs 22:30:34 aye 22:30:42 there's a handy diagram 22:30:51 still, traditionally it has been a lot of compromising to make sure no one is completely outraged 22:31:09 you mean the Swedish Model? 22:31:12 yeah 22:31:18 that kind of stuff 22:31:20 http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/images/consensus.jpg 22:31:45 well, Compromises in Consensus Decision Making would (hopefully) be least likely outcome 22:31:47 Oranjer, that looks scaled down. Hard to read 22:31:53 sorry 22:32:02 it's not scaled down, though 22:33:01 how do you know? 22:33:20 It is small, but not unreadable. 22:33:32 because it is at the maximum size, and that is the size it is presented as 22:33:36 MizardX, try it on a high DPI screen 22:33:40 then tell me it is readable 22:33:43 oh! 22:33:46 -!- augur has joined. 22:33:47 * AnMaster forgot exact DPI on his laptop 22:33:51 around 118 or so iirc? 22:33:52 ha! I feel like the idiot 22:34:03 http://treegroup.info/topics/Consensus_Decison_Making-CH.pdf 22:34:11 there's a much bigger image there! 22:34:15 page 4 22:34:26 same image yes 22:34:35 yes 22:34:35 Oranjer, the conway thing. Expand on that please 22:35:28 basically, the quality and quantity of communication between any departments/members of a company/team will almost certainly be reflected in the system that that company/team makes 22:35:41 as in, if a team is working on designing a car 22:36:01 mhm? 22:36:08 what then 22:36:31 as in, if two team members have difficulty communicating, then the product they make will reflect such miscommunication 22:36:54 Oranjer, mhm. Depends on how interconnected the parts they are working on are 22:37:01 exactly 22:37:18 lets say, working on the fans in the car and the radio installation? 22:37:26 the structure of a system/product will almost certainly reflect the structure of its creator's organization 22:37:32 ha, exactly! 22:37:39 where the fans I mean the engine fan 22:37:48 of course 22:37:58 rather unrelated 22:38:11 if they dislike each other it probably won't affect stuff 22:38:16 ha 22:38:24 while if it was two related systems, yeah, could lead to issues 22:38:30 exactly 22:38:39 and there are no good managers 22:38:42 we all know that 22:38:46 so no help from there either 22:38:51 heh 22:39:01 well, that's precisely my point 22:39:12 Oranjer, it seems rather obvious... 22:39:24 I fail to see why it even has a specific name 22:39:28 that if Conway's Law is a good indicator of a product's structure, then we should change the organization 22:39:38 well, AnMaster, it's not obvious to all 22:39:43 Oranjer, oh? 22:39:55 more importantly, of course it'll be obvious to you, once I explain it to you 22:40:18 Holmes always found that if he explained how he got to a conclusion, everyone would say "oh, that's so obvious!" 22:40:27 *Sherlock Holmes, of course 22:40:35 Oranjer, it seems (to me) obvious that people who can communicate better, and are working on a project will have less problems than people who *can't* 22:40:44 which seems to be all that law says 22:41:01 not only people, but entire departments 22:41:16 it's not only communication, though 22:41:19 it's the structure itself 22:41:54 if you make two separate departments--air conditioning, and heating--you'd see such a distinction evident in the resulting product 22:42:27 * AnMaster wonders why ls -a ~ lists several hundred files that match /\.serverauth\.[0-9]+/ 22:42:34 what?? 22:42:38 some from recently, some from 2006 22:42:49 and everywhere in between 22:42:51 what!?!? 22:43:04 ~/.serverauth.6481: X11 Xauthority data 22:43:05 heh 22:43:10 I think I know what it is 22:43:15 odd thing that they were left around 22:43:25 rather than removed when I quit X 22:43:40 * AnMaster loves file(1) 22:43:56 uh-huh 22:44:00 anyway, I must eat 22:44:01 see ya 22:44:03 Oranjer, night 22:44:07 * AnMaster goes to sleep 22:44:11 aww 22:44:12 okay 22:44:42 see ya tomorrow 22:47:52 CDM would be useless without good communication. The worse the communication, the longer it takes to make a decision, and the lower the ratio of agreed vs unresolved issues. This could explain why the court cases takes so long... 22:49:14 CDM? 22:49:59 MizardX? 22:50:18 Consensus Decison Making 22:50:23 oh, ha! 22:51:02 true, it would be largely useless without good communication 22:51:59 although, I do not see the connection between "taking longer to make a decision" and "the lowering of the ration of agreed vs. unresolved issues" 22:52:45 bad communication = more people disagreeing, and less chance of those getting resolved 22:53:11 hmmm 22:53:45 well then, I guess it would be imperative to provide a structure that encourages good communication, for Consensus Decision Making to work 22:54:33 know of such a thing? 22:55:01 "a structure that encourages good communication" ? 22:55:07 aye 22:55:13 No idea 22:55:16 a medium of communication 22:55:18 :( 22:55:52 well, what's wrong with "we meet every Xday at Y o'clock"? 22:57:53 Maybe repeated meatings. One or two hours a day, until the issue is resolved. That way there wouldn't be so many people wanting to get out, and just agreeing with whatever is presented. 23:00:53 Coundn't that be how they do in the European Parlament (and other big decision making organizations)? 23:06:20 -!- MizardX has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:20 -!- fax has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:29 -!- Asztal has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:33 -!- Warrigal has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:37 -!- cal153 has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:43 -!- Ilari has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:45 -!- dbc has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:45 -!- sebbu2 has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:45 -!- HackEgo has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:45 -!- pikhq has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:48 -!- FireFly has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:48 -!- Oranjer has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:48 -!- adam_d has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:50 -!- BeholdMyGlory has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:50 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:50 -!- mtve has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:50 -!- bsmntbombdood_ has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:50 -!- jix has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:51 -!- SimonRC has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:06:51 -!- Cerise has quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 23:07:08 -!- MizardX has joined. 23:07:08 -!- fax has joined. 23:07:08 -!- Asztal has joined. 23:07:08 -!- Warrigal has joined. 23:07:35 -!- cal153 has joined. 23:07:35 -!- FireFly has joined. 23:07:35 -!- Oranjer has joined. 23:07:35 -!- adam_d has joined. 23:07:35 -!- BeholdMyGlory has joined. 23:07:35 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 23:07:35 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 23:07:35 -!- mtve has joined. 23:07:35 -!- HackEgo has joined. 23:07:35 -!- bsmntbombdood_ has joined. 23:07:35 -!- jix has joined. 23:07:35 -!- pikhq has joined. 23:07:35 -!- Cerise has joined. 23:07:35 -!- SimonRC has joined. 23:07:35 -!- Ilari has joined. 23:07:35 -!- dbc has joined. 23:09:07 oh, shit, netsplit 23:26:13 -!- Gracenotes has joined. 23:26:25 -!- coppro has joined. 23:48:31 -!- MigoMipo has quit ("Page closed").