00:00:03 Tomorrow? 00:00:12 (Common noun?) 00:00:42 Yes. Tomorrow. 00:01:00 Zomg I have tomorrow off of work whoot 00:01:04 Yeah I feel oddly motivated this year, and 4 AP classes puts a lot of work. 00:02:02 Well, all I really have is US history homework left (2 large worksheets), but I also want to get started on some of next week's math homework and I might start on some of next week's Physics homework, depending on my mood. 00:02:40 And vocab is typically a 3 hour affair per day, heh. 00:03:56 ihope_: VERSION RESPONSE: I'm still using RawIRC 00:04:23 Why can't you do a real response thing, then? 00:05:18 I don't remember what the version response format is ^^ 00:05:31 * ifndef_GREGOR_H knows that it's some kind of CTCP, but that's it. 00:05:53 NOTICE ihope :^AVERSION RawIRC^A 00:06:37 Oh, I see, PRIVMSG for request, NOTICE for response. 00:06:39 Weird. 00:09:48 ifndef_GREGOR_H: The IRC spec states that a PRIVMSG isn't to be used for automated replies; that's the job of NOTICE. 00:09:55 CTCP follows that spec. 00:12:30 * pikhq makes out with his macro language 00:12:43 pikhq: That's hot. 00:12:53 Mmm. Technophilia. 00:13:17 And, since I made it, it's also incest. :p 00:13:27 Technophilic incest. Whee. 00:14:50 Hmm, it seems I was wrong or something. 00:15:17 [ifndef_GREGOR_H] [\0x01]VERSION RawIRC[\0x01] 00:15:33 ...Did you send that to the channel? 00:15:44 I sent one to the channel just to see what clients would do ;) 00:15:54 Of course... 00:15:54 17:06 CTCP VERSION reply from ifndef_GREGOR_H in channel #esoteric: RawIRC 00:15:58 That's what I got. 00:16:29 PRIVMSG looks better. 00:16:58 In this ChatZilla theme thing, it's red and bold rather than plain black. 00:17:19 And there's [] around the nick instead of <>. 00:17:28 Other than that, it's all the same. 00:20:19 It looks quite similar to a PRIVMSG in ERC. 00:20:27 -ihope_- Eh, why doesn't everybody use NOTICE instead of PRIVMSG? PRIVMSG looks better. 00:20:42 * pikhq writes a standard macros better 00:20:49 BLARGH. 00:20:56 My brain isn't working. 00:20:57 I'll read your spec now, and then go to homework pikhq. 00:21:09 * pikhq is writing a standard set of macros for the language 00:21:11 Razor-X: :D 00:23:15 .... Incomprehensible spec pikhq :D. 00:23:22 What are you comparing the spec to? 00:23:35 For these sorts of things I prefer a straight-up BNF or ABNF. 00:23:58 BNF? ABNF? 00:24:12 Backus-Naur Format. Augmented Backus-Naur Format. 00:24:36 Don't know it, sorry. 00:24:42 ..... o_O?! 00:24:49 You've *never* seen a BNF?! 00:25:05 They're quite readable for human beings and somewhat easy to parse, which is why I love them, but wow. 00:26:05 Zomg 00:26:32 Most RFCs use either BNF or ABNF. 00:27:42 I assume you'd like me to actually write one for you? 00:28:02 Yes. 00:28:59 http://esoteric.voxelperfect.net/wiki/Brainfuck_algorithms I'm going to rewrite some of these into this macro language first. 00:29:32 And I think you're reinventing the wheel too, IIRC. 00:29:41 Take a look at BFA. Although that's a bit different. 00:30:05 Link? 00:31:03 Gah. I can't believe I haven't bookmarked this... time to do some creative google searching. 00:31:43 Yeah, it's been done. 00:31:43 I'm going to call BNF "Boring Nasty Format" from now on. 00:31:48 And quite thoroughly, IIRC. 00:32:07 s/IIRC/it seems/ 00:32:13 http://esoteric.sange.fi/brainfuck/utils/bfcomp-0.09/ 00:32:21 Oh, that? 00:32:39 I took some inspiration from that, actually. 00:32:48 What's the logistic difference here? 00:32:50 That seems significantly more advanced than pikhq is aiming for. 00:33:00 Or is it just a reimplementation of BFA? 00:33:03 Mine is much lower level. 00:33:25 It's in between the BFC and BFA of the bfcomp language. . . 00:33:49 Ah. 00:34:17 My main issues with that was that it was a bit inefficient, because it was too high-level to allow the programmer to have much control over the resulting Brainfuck code. 00:34:50 Think "C preprocessor on steroids" 00:35:00 I'll think about writing a Scheme (this format)->BF compiler. 00:35:02 (IMHO this could all be done with the C preprocessor, but anyway :P ) 00:35:02 Actually, yeah. That's what it is. 00:35:25 ifndef_GREGOR_H: Yeah, but the C preprocessor implementation, which you've done, is fugly. 00:35:33 8-D 00:35:49 This is nice and clean, IMO. 00:36:03 * ifndef_GREGOR_H has to see some functioning code before he can judge. 00:36:11 -!- ifndef_GREGOR_H has quit (Remote closed the connection). 00:36:17 ARGH 00:36:21 That was ^C you f***ing idiot >_< 00:36:22 Bug? 00:36:26 ;). 00:36:30 PEBKAC 00:36:38 Sounds like RawIRC is quite the intuitive client. 00:36:51 The only ctrl chars used are P, O, and A. 00:36:53 Does it keep a persistent line below the telnet traffic? 00:36:55 But I decided to type C. 00:37:05 -!- ifndef_GREGOR_H has joined. 00:37:05 Razor-X: Among other things, that compiler has the idea of scope. Mine has just a global scope. . . 00:37:09 Razor-X: Yeah. 00:37:09 ifndef_GREGOR_H: Bravo. 00:37:24 :( 00:37:25 Did you use Ncurses or simple terminal control characters? 00:37:38 Simple terminal control. Nowhere near advanced enough to need *curses ;) 00:38:03 It's also UNIX-only. Maybe even GNU/Linux-only. :P 00:38:07 I know more about *curses than about terminal control characters :P. 00:39:57 If I get bored enough, I'll implement the macro language in itself. :p 00:41:00 -_-'' 00:41:16 I'm debating on whether to port ERC to Scheme or not. 00:41:33 Pff, ERC is for pansies. Port RawIRC to Scheme. 00:41:38 That's first. 00:41:47 But I'll add ``features'' to it. 00:41:59 They're not features if they destroy the spirit of it :P 00:42:07 That's why they're ``features''. 00:42:15 And not features. 00:42:17 Hahahah 00:42:38 I think I'll add scripting support to RawIRC. 00:42:42 Nah, I won't be adding much. A Scheme shell, and maybe a macro or two, and an RC file for you to define your own macros. 00:42:56 That's about all. 00:42:56 Basically, you could pass in a number of scripts, and it would fork them off and feed the raw IRC traffic into them as well :P 00:43:16 If God wanted Man to use `` and '', He wouldn't have invented " :-P 00:43:30 IF ENGLISH IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR JESUS, IT'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR TEXAS 00:43:36 God can go and worship Donald Knuth. 00:43:54 IF TEX IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR JESUS etc 00:43:54 ifndef_GREGOR_H: so English isn't good enough for Texas? 00:43:58 Of course, you could use Scheme's power to turn RawIRC into a *real* IRC client, but heaven forbid what drives you to use RawIRC in the first place then. 00:44:06 ihope_: Apparently :P 00:47:24 Learn Shavian. Bubs. 00:56:54 -!- GreyKnight has joined. 00:56:59 Yarr. 00:57:57 Ahoy. 00:58:16 Chatzilla? Pff! Real men use RawIRC. 00:58:20 :P 00:59:16 Real men write bits directly onto the ethernet cable with their penis. 01:02:47 ... 01:02:51 Stop trying it! 01:02:55 <_< 01:03:19 You can... do that? 01:03:49 ifndef_GREGOR_H has gone very quiet 01:03:59 I think he tried it and... electrocuted himself 01:04:42 -!- ihope__ has joined. 01:08:22 -!- ihope__ has changed nick to ihope. 01:08:25 Razor-X: consider yourself poked 01:13:05 Mmkay. . . 01:13:22 Now, this thing, as it stands right now, makes very efficient use of the Brainfuck memory. . . 01:14:13 Well, I think I can call this current EagleBot... what? Version 2? 01:14:23 -!- kipple_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 01:14:48 Version 1 sucked, version 2 isn't as nice either, and I'll write version 3 tomorrow. 01:16:02 Now, if I could just implement it, I'd have something here. 01:16:56 Memo the spec to me and I'll take a look at it... 01:17:18 Tomorrow, I mean. 01:17:37 When do we get EagleBot XQ? 01:17:41 That makes two people that have said basically the same thing. x_x 01:17:58 Oh. 01:18:01 Who was the other one? 01:18:06 Razor-X 01:18:13 Did you memo it to her? 01:18:25 No, in IRC. 01:18:50 Well, memo it to me, or else I'll memo it to myself! 01:19:03 http://pastebin.ca/160055 01:19:04 * ihope holds his finger over the "enter" key as if it were a suicide threat 01:19:31 * ihope memos the URL to himself 01:19:53 onoz 01:20:09 Shut up, or I'll memo it to you too! 01:20:44 * GreyKnight runs around with his arms in the air 01:21:13 * ihope smiles 01:21:19 * ihope memos it to EgoBot 01:22:40 Screw it. I'll write bits and pieces of it myself. 01:23:37 -!- ihope_ has quit (Connection timed out). 01:23:50 Noo! Don't leave! 01:23:52 Oh, wait... 01:25:56 Someone yanked him away by the iron chain 01:27:14 -!- ihope_ has joined. 01:27:28 EagleBot v2 makes a half-decent alternative. 01:27:33 * ihope talks to ihope_ 01:27:50 * ihope waits for an answer 01:28:13 * ihope gives up and goes to bed 01:59:46 * pikhq has almost finished one stage of this compiler 02:23:02 Whoo. 02:23:08 Got a stage of the compiler done. 02:25:49 compiler of what? 02:26:01 My macro language. . . 02:26:14 linky linky 02:26:18 Although this is the stage *after* macros have been expanded, so. . . 02:26:25 http://pastebin.ca/160055 02:28:49 I approve. 02:31:24 Just need to expand the macros, and I'll be *done*. 02:40:47 Ahoy there me hearties and pokers. 02:41:07 And I don't wanna do it!!! 02:41:11 * pikhq cries like a baby 02:42:16 GreyKnight: How's been your experience with Compressed English? 02:43:29 Any more digraphs you think we should add? Changes? I need to formalize some table syntax and then I have to look into the math syntax. 02:43:48 I was also thinking of introducing trigraphs, but I need a more convenient system of characters that's supported by TeX. 02:44:05 I had one useful idea: 02:44:19 Mmmm? 02:44:26 The word INTERCAL currently compresses pretty poorly 02:44:33 for instance 02:44:51 It should be condensed to 5 characters. 02:45:04 except for the +s to denote the capitals. 02:45:18 Does that need to be explicit? 02:45:24 I suggest a +[...] syntax for multiple capitalizations 02:45:48 I see the use in that. I agree. 02:45:58 maybe not for this example (at least when translated by a human), but there are probably situations where there'd be confusion 02:46:21 I was thinking of adding the polygraph ``ough''. 02:46:28 similarly for ±[...] 02:46:38 Ah. Yeah. 02:46:55 I have most of a UTF-8 encoder written 02:47:00 Nice :). 02:47:09 I need to code a LaTeX converter. 02:47:39 I was also thinking of adding in ``ow'' as a digraph. Any other suggestions? Any characters you'd consider usable? (Preferrably from the LaTeX symbols list.) 02:47:46 I used my suggestion of dot-diaresis => colon, dot-macron => question mark 02:48:12 I'll add that into my standard then. 02:48:18 although I don't think you ever actually endorsed that :-P 02:48:28 Ah. Fine ;). 02:49:56 It occurred to me that we could reduce a/an to a single form, but there are actually some odd situations with it ("a hotel" vs "an hotel", depending). Thoughts? 02:51:15 I think that it should be used. 02:51:38 Well.... 02:51:55 We can add a character to be `a', and accented it becomes ``an''. 02:54:21 This may get confusing but, you know how a dot up top repeats the vowel after the consonant if a vowel is on top of a consonant? 02:54:32 I suggest adding an underdot to repeat the consonant instead of the vowel. 02:54:45 yurk 02:54:51 Too messy? 02:55:30 I was assuming vowels never received repeats and that "consonant-vowelsign-overdot" meant "consonant consonant vowel" 02:55:54 No, it meant consonant vowel vowel. 02:56:07 if you had a double vowel you'd use the floating-vowel symbol 02:56:09 pants 02:56:15 Pants? 02:56:26 an expression of irritation 02:56:26 But how would you add the double vowel symbol to an accent? 02:57:03 I mean, for instance, "feel" becomes "f-acute, hypen-acute, l" 02:57:26 whereas "butter" becomes "b-grave,t-acute-overdot,r" 03:00:45 I can't type b-grave :-P 03:01:27 Why not use an underdot or an ``arc'' to distinguish between repeating vowels and consonants? 03:02:22 well, the top is getting pretty cluttered, so underdot sounds best 03:03:11 so underdot repeats the consonant, then? 03:03:14 Yeah. 03:03:56 *updates* 03:04:20 I'll add in vowel repeats later, that'll require a larger change 03:04:48 Heh. Fine. 03:08:07 oh, how to deal with the situation where the letters of a digraph have different cases? For instance, my encoder currently converts both "Church" and "CHurch" to "μrμ", but this destroys information about the original 03:08:42 er, "μ̀rμ" 03:09:47 Hmmm.... that's a thought I didn't think of. 03:10:31 Which only gets worse with trigraphs and beyond :-o 03:10:43 Yeah, I was thinking of a general form of capitalization. 03:10:47 what about multiple capitalization operators? 03:11:13 "++μ" = "CH", "+±μ" => "Ch", etc 03:11:58 well, some of those can be dropped if you know what the "expected" case is, but you get the idea 03:11:59 I'm thinking for an n-graph, you can specify general capitalization like \+\+\\+ ... \ containing n amount of \, where a + denotes a capitalized letter. 03:12:34 Rather, n+2 amount of \'s. 03:12:48 Since you have the preceding and terminating \ here to denote the general capitalization form. 03:13:03 not very compressed, though :-( 03:13:06 Unless you want to drop the preceding one for conciseness..... 03:13:16 Well, how often do you need general capitalization forms? :P. 03:13:31 hopefully not often 03:13:45 Unless we want to define a repetition operator which works on language constructs and letters. 03:14:00 Other than the in-place cedilla. 03:14:37 I think that'd interrupt the flow in handwritten texts 03:14:48 I thought you'd chucked the cedilla? 03:15:54 What performs the in-place repetitions then? 03:16:18 overdot and underdot (vowel and consonant, respectively) 03:16:37 Oh... yes true. 03:18:07 Agh. 03:18:15 One bit of my compiler that *is* broken. 03:18:30 The part about variable expansion, specifically. 03:18:49 Mmmm... I think I need to at the very least add in a digraph for -sh. 03:19:30 Time to take one more look at the Greek alphabet..... 03:19:42 I think I already recommended that :-P 03:20:19 varsigma? 03:20:19 Oh, heh. 03:20:49 though I guess it's potentially confusable with 's' in handwritten text 03:20:51 Wouldn't that look too much like `s' though? 03:20:52 Yeah. 03:21:27 lowercase xi? ('ξ') 03:21:57 Isn't it confusable with Epsilon? 03:22:23 not the way I write it :-P 03:22:30 :P 03:22:44 the top hook and the tail should be pretty prominent 03:22:55 What about lowercase xi? 03:23:20 Oh..... 03:23:20 isn't that... what we were just talking about? 03:23:29 I meant lowercase. 03:23:35 UH. 03:23:38 I meant uppercase. 03:23:42 AGH. 03:23:44 Ξ 03:23:49 Yeh. 03:23:49 (also: HURR) 03:24:22 So? 03:24:26 not really confusable with anything 03:24:35 should work 03:24:58 writing it will be an unusual experience for non-Greek non-mathematicians, though :-) 03:25:18 I'm neither :P. 03:25:29 Look, if a high schooler can come up with it, others can write in it. 03:25:35 :P 03:25:44 try writing it; it's a strange experience for an English-speaker 03:25:49 I have. 03:25:56 Trust me, it's easier to write it than TeX it. 03:25:59 :D 03:26:04 it doesn't really have the same "flow" as Latin letters 03:26:04 A LOT easier. 03:26:09 :-P 03:26:23 I find it lends itself to handwriting pretty well. 03:26:44 'Least my handwriting. 03:27:43 k 03:27:51 You haven't tried handwriting it yet? 03:29:11 not much 03:29:29 I do have a life, you know :-P 03:29:33 :P 03:29:45 It seems to work pretty well, even though it was initially a smattering of ``Oooh! TeX has this symbol!''. 03:31:27 I think I'll have this encoder have an option to use the precomposed character if one is available; composition characters are great for general-purpose stuff, but they tend to be put together badly on proportional fonts, at least in most software 03:31:50 even monospaced fonts suffer if you try to put too many in one cell 03:40:12 Remember, umulat-fullstop now represents `,' . 03:41:32 last I heard you were using ring for that and umlaut (==diaresis) for colon :-\ 03:41:56 Mmmmmm...... 03:42:06 Oh wait, an umulaut is a diaresis? 03:42:14 I may be getting the two confused then. 03:42:27 Which one is the double-dot up top? 03:42:44 technically they're different, but the difference is only in the distance between the dots, so they're generally identical 03:42:56 Ah. 03:43:07 they both consist of a horizontal pair of dots above the letter 03:43:08 Then what was the downward-curve thing? 03:43:37 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaresis 03:43:56 a downward-pointing arc? 03:44:02 Yes. 03:44:11 that's a breve 03:44:14 Ah! 03:44:15 There we are! 03:45:40 A comma stays ring-fullstop then. 03:45:46 (at least when it's on top; I don't know if an "underbreve" is used anywhere or if it has a special name) 03:48:17 What do you have down as -nt? Hyphen-ring? 03:51:28 eh? I have hyphen as the "floating vowel" character 03:51:39 Errr... 03:51:41 Hyphen-n my bad. 03:51:42 I have lowercase eta for NT 03:51:50 Oh. Blah. Yeah. 03:52:04 That was a stupid mistake on me not erasing old things. 03:52:26 you were thinking about n-tilde for NT at one point, I think 03:52:34 Yeah. But eta is fine. 03:52:35 you need source control :-3 03:52:40 I'm doing it now :P. 05:09:04 -!- anonfunc has joined. 05:17:42 -!- ihope_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 05:18:01 -!- ihope has quit (Connection timed out). 06:19:46 -!- Sgeo has quit ("Ex-Chat"). 06:33:22 -!- pikhq has changed nick to rms. 06:33:33 -!- rms has changed nick to pikhq. 06:34:11 ._. 06:34:20 It made sense in #gnu. 06:34:40 Ah 06:58:42 I'll bet. 06:58:48 * GregorR wonders why he isn't in #gnu 07:01:35 Because it's Not Unix? 07:02:48 * pikhq starts wishing he had a Thinkpad laptop. . . 07:03:21 Those things are built to look like you could beat the fuck out of someone for their stupidity with one, and then demonstrate to them the smart way to do it. . . :p 07:05:05 My work-laptop is a Thinkpad. 07:05:20 It says "T43" on it. 07:05:43 * GreyKnight <3 T22 07:05:46 The only fancy thing about it is the fingerprint reader thing. 07:05:59 Trackpoints ftw 07:06:05 Ratpoison FTW. 07:06:37 Not for the rats it isn't :-P 07:06:57 [[Ratpoison]] Wheee. 07:30:31 -!- GreyKnight has quit ("BRB"). 07:32:50 -!- GreyKnight has joined. 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 09:14:51 * GreyKnight requests suggestions for a good language to teach small children 09:39:48 -!- GreyKnight has quit (niven.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 09:39:48 -!- anonfunc has quit (niven.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 09:46:20 -!- anonfunc has joined. 09:48:26 -!- GreyKnight has joined. 09:52:36 Programming language? 09:54:08 whee netsplit 09:54:15 yah 09:55:09 Mmm.... Scheme! ..... 09:55:41 Actually, I learned the fundamentals of programming through ``RPG Maker 95'', heh. 09:56:29 ORLy 09:56:40 (@lilo) 09:56:43 Then some QBASIC, and I 'unno, it clicked somewhere. 09:56:57 I think I will start with a lisp 09:57:05 Great :D. 09:57:21 But I just wonder if Lisps are a bit too.... mathematical I guess.... 09:57:27 possibly one with some graphics capabilities 09:57:46 A lot of the abstractions are intuitive if you've taken Algebra I, but until then, yeah. 09:58:28 Thomas will have me teaching him 09:58:34 so he will get it easily :-3 09:58:37 :D 09:58:53 Mathematics and small children are my two specialties 09:59:06 I've wondered what happens if someone starts with a Lisp as a first language. 09:59:31 For imperative programmers, the switch from imperative to functional is mind-wracking, I wonder how it is from functional to imperative. 10:01:41 There's Logo, for all your turtle graphics needs. 10:02:12 I seem to recall that the language was somehow funny, too. 10:02:59 Yeah. I learned Logo at (my old rich private) school as the first language, but I was always interested in computers beyond that. 10:03:36 Can't really remember specifics of the language, though. Last time I used it probably at the age of 10 or so. 10:03:44 Logo is really Lisp in disguise :-) 10:03:54 One day I and a group of friends walked in the lab and 3 sixth-graders had left their programs up. We sneakily copied them to our floppies, stole our floppies when the teacher wasn't looking and took it home to analyze. 10:04:07 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_programming_language 10:04:44 I got the most interesting one, a concentric ring of circles in an odd shape. I learned all sorts of stuff reading the source. 10:05:48 The Logo programming language is a functional programming language. It is an easier to read adaptation and dialect of the Lisp programming language; some have called it Lisp without the parentheses. 10:05:55 (<-WP) 10:06:15 Heh. 10:06:31 I don't remember much though. But yeah, there were no imperative qualities IIRC. 10:07:21 basically they swapped the parentheses for brackets :-3 10:08:31 The basic style of doing it ("fw X, lt Z, fw Y, ...") is rather imperative-y. 10:09:24 well, in a progn-y sort of way :-3 10:09:35 beats monads :-) 10:09:42 * Razor-X shudders. 10:09:58 Monads make the babies cry :(. 10:10:01 I don't remember having any understanding of higher-order functions or anything, back then in the Logo days. 10:11:20 well, you were probably more concerned with drawing pretty pictures :-P 10:14:14 Admittedly GW-BASIC (which, I think, was my first language) wasn't any better either in that regard, but I didn't really "get" Prolog. (Which was the other language for which there was an interpreter installed.) 10:15:47 I don't think I really get Prolog now either. My Scheme interpreter in Prolog is mostly abusing Prolog to work like any old imperative programming language. 10:21:02 I haven't looked into Prolog at all. 10:21:21 Is there an existing Lisp that'd serve this purpose well, or should I throw something together? 10:21:31 Higher-order functions are deceptively easy once understood, mysteries until then :P. 10:21:49 Why not pick up some Scheme and X graphics stuff GreyKnight? 10:22:14 MIT/GNU Scheme comes with an (very basic) implementation of X. 10:22:36 PLT Scheme has a GUI thing. 10:22:48 I personally didn't much like it, but it does. 10:22:52 How is Guile? It seems messy. 10:23:12 But it has the most activity of all the Schemes :(. 10:24:22 There's also xdraw for graphics; it's what our Scheme course used for project-work, which means that every student's project had a completely different-looking (usually: ugley) GUI. http://users.tkk.fi/~rsaikkon/software/xdraw.html 10:24:32 I picked up MIT/GNU Scheme only beacuse.... it *is* the official GNU distribution. 10:24:36 He'll probably be wanting to bring stuff onto his mum's windows computer... that outta be fun :-( 10:25:25 PLT should be relatively windows-friendly. And it has that IDE, of sorts. 10:25:36 You could probably code something for the Windows API too, I know MIT/GNU Scheme cooperates fine on it. 10:26:01 Razor-X; That's not something to teach to small children. They'll be scarred for life! 10:26:21 I meant that GreyKnight does the WinAPI coding :P. 10:26:32 Oh! Well, that's better. 10:26:57 See, once a project decides that it needs to involve WinAPI, I usually come up with a million other things I'd rather be doing 10:27:07 Like sticking rusty forks in my eyes 10:27:18 I wish there was some review site of all the Schemes. 10:27:31 Trust me, X code is no fun either. 10:27:46 * GreyKnight grumbles 10:28:17 Maybe I should do a web-based solution and just draw with gd :-3 10:28:49 Hmm 10:28:52 I would think there are GD-like libraries for on-screen drawing. 10:28:56 That xdraw is one. 10:29:18 I could actually pull this off, I think... 10:29:40 If you use Guile, someone's probably written some library to some closs-platform GUI toolkit. 10:29:52 But I mean, Guile seemed messy in some places to me. 10:30:02 GUI toolkits are no fun; drawing lines 'n squares 'n colorful blobs is. 10:30:27 I think I'll make gkd-lisp into something less... ugly... and fold it into a nice web thingy 10:30:28 There's the implementation list at http://community.schemewiki.org/?scheme-faq-standards#implementations but it has no details, so going through it is quite a chore. 10:31:52 From what I can tell, PLT Scheme, MIT/GNU Scheme, and Guile are the top 3, with Scheme48 as some forgotten-child runners-up candidate. 10:32:59 Scheme48 is what some people on #scheme use. 10:35:42 What's your experience with the Schemes? 10:37:41 Well, I've been quite partial to mzscheme-the-interpreter, but much dislike the other PLT Scheme things (the web server and the DrScheme environment); Scheme48 looked interesting, but haven't used it much; and Chicken seems to be a nice Scheme compiler with quite a lot of extensionds (called "eggs" there) for things like OpenGL. 10:39:39 Does MzScheme have many libraries? 10:43:20 Quite a lot, yes. And it's relatively painless to write them; wrote one for the PostgreSQL C library. 10:47:09 NCurses already there? 10:48:28 grr, Ncurses! 10:49:17 Ncurses! 10:49:18 Fine! 10:54:21 Chicken is nice except for a few little gripes, for one it doesen't support i/o-ports. 10:58:00 I think there was a curses lib. 10:59:26 Don't see it right now, though. 11:03:40 Heh. 11:10:55 There's a ncurses.egg for Chicken. :p 11:11:10 I know, heh. 11:11:34 I like Chicken the most out of them all, except for its very sparse reference manual. Still, MIT/GNU Scheme offers some great features. 13:09:03 -!- ihope has joined. 14:10:53 -!- Arrogant has joined. 14:18:09 -!- puzzlet has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 14:20:26 -!- puzzlet has joined. 14:38:39 -!- Arrogant has quit ("Leaving"). 15:06:03 -!- Arrogant has joined. 15:40:27 -!- Arrogant has quit ("Leaving"). 16:02:31 -!- Arrogant has joined. 16:29:15 -!- jix__ has joined. 16:29:23 -!- tgwizard has joined. 16:44:50 -!- kipple_ has joined. 16:50:52 -!- Sgeo has joined. 16:51:20 -!- Arrogant has quit ("Leaving"). 16:52:18 -!- marinus has joined. 16:52:34 -!- marinus has quit (SendQ exceeded). 16:52:35 -!- marinus has joined. 16:56:35 For the esolang contest, should an unicode program also output the "begin " line, and if so what name should I use? 17:15:17 I think that the "begin ... " segment ought to be required (it's not a lot of extra work in most cases) , and the filename can be arbitrary. 17:15:27 ok, thanks 17:15:32 no prob 17:22:36 Even in Brainfuck, it wouldn't be terribly hard. 17:22:39 ;) 17:23:10 * pikhq wishes he had sufficient motivation to work on his macro languag 17:33:22 * GreyKnight gets the Motivator 17:45:55 * RodgerTheGreat gets the bleach to clean up after the Motivator 17:47:15 lime and a roll of carpe 17:47:18 * carpet 17:47:52 * ihope calls the media 17:48:05 Any use of the Motivator has to be caught on film. 17:48:26 That is, any failed attempt to use the Motivator. 17:53:33 -!- _jol_ has joined. 18:10:36 the moral of this story: Be careful what you wish for, *especially* in #Esoteric 18:10:48 Hahah. 18:35:40 -!- _jol_ has quit ("leaving"). 18:47:53 -!- calamari has joined. 20:05:53 * pikhq curses even more at his damned macro system 20:21:21 * ihope clumsily makes his way through POV-Ray 20:23:30 POV-Ray \o/ 20:25:23 Can I give the thing some sort of ambient lighting or background color or something? 20:26:06 brb, one sec 20:27:14 harrumph 20:27:19 now, what was your question? 20:27:33 Can I give this stuff some background color other than black? 20:28:49 background { rgb } 20:30:33 Thanks. 20:30:42 It's hard to see a black sphere on a black background. 20:31:04 So give the objects colour :-P 20:32:01 How do I do that? :-P 20:32:30 sphere { , r pigment { rgb } } 20:35:35 also, there's the #default directive to change the default from black: 20:36:00 basically what I'm saying here is: RTFM :-3 20:36:05 There are also some material editors for pov-ray. 20:36:54 Real Men code it by hand :-3 20:37:01 If one likes point-and-clicking gradients more than entering numeric RGB values. 20:37:16 ie, if one is a girly-boy 20:37:17 Real Men write code to generate their .pov files. :p 20:37:24 (In FORTRAN.) 20:37:44 *BACKWARDS* 20:44:37 Uphill both ways! 20:46:39 Eh... 20:47:18 Or they write INTERCAL code that compiles to backwards FORTRAN code. 20:48:15 Or they write Malbolge code. 20:48:24 *barf* 20:49:22 Good think there aren't many real men out there. 20:49:30 THey do all of this while eating Haggis! 20:50:14 real men don't eat haggis 20:50:30 that's for girly-boys who are trying to prove themselves to be real men 20:50:41 :P 20:51:30 How do real men prove themselves to be real men? 20:51:35 yeah. those Haggis eaters even wear skirts. How girly is that? 20:52:27 * GreyKnight h8s on kipple_ 20:52:36 I also wear a kilt, girly-boy 20:52:43 ihope: they don't need to 20:53:00 -!- ivan` has joined. 20:53:06 Everybody just knows that they're real? 20:53:14 If you can look at him without your face spontaneously breaking, he's a girly-boy 20:53:19 otherwise, a real man 20:53:25 Yeah, like the GNU Emus. 20:53:33 ihope: The real men are willing to fight Chuck Norris. :p 20:53:36 We know they exist, somewhere. 20:53:59 http://greyfire.org/picture_library/kilt3.jpg \o/ 20:54:00 pikhq: so Chuck Norris is not a real man, or Chuck Norris is willing to fight himself? 20:54:06 oh my, would you happen to be Scottish, GreyKnight? 20:54:13 ihope: Damn right, Chuck Norris is willing to fight himself. 20:54:22 Of course, he's one step above a real man, so. . . 20:54:30 Irish, but we originally (mists of time) come from Scotland 20:54:34 Wooh. Chicken allows you to do low level Scheme. 20:54:47 (You must all be real men, except GregorR and maybe others, because I can't look at any of you.) 20:54:52 Which is just as well, because the Irish regional tartans are crap :-( 20:54:53 You're a Scots-Irish?! 20:55:05 ihope: The only reason you can't look at us is distance. 20:55:14 Oh. 20:55:18 Especially the Antrim one (which is what I would get). It's pretty poor. 20:55:28 If you look at us, and your face doesn't break, then we're not real men. 20:55:41 * pikhq can trace his family back to England. . . 20:55:54 I can trace my family back to India. 20:55:57 * Razor-X thinks back one generation. 20:56:12 I think there is a picture (or a couple) of /me in the interweb, so I'm rather lookable in a technical sense. 20:56:36 * pikhq thinks back to pre-Revolutionary War America. . . 20:57:13 Well, somewhere along the line one of my ancestors slept with a French guy, but whatever. 20:57:24 (Hence my French last name.) 20:57:33 My commiserations. 20:57:45 I know. It's a horrible language. 20:57:55 * pikhq has a very, very British last name. . . 20:58:00 Worcester. Wheee. . . 20:58:03 Canterburry? 20:58:09 *bury 20:58:21 Awww. I love the British last names that end with -bury. 20:58:26 They sound so.... British. 20:58:27 Hah. 20:58:56 My last name comes from a bloody city in England. 'Tis quite British to me. :p 21:00:17 I wonder why British last names don't end with -sex :(. 21:00:19 My last name is "Kallasjoki", which I guess is about as far as you can get from being British, without using a different script. 21:00:35 If you can name a city with that, why not a person's last name? 21:03:12 They're counties, not towns :-P 21:03:24 -!- jix__ has changed nick to J|x. 21:03:40 -!- J|x has changed nick to jix. 21:04:16 Stop making excuses for Middlesex. 21:04:19 {middle,es,sus}sex from {middle,east,south} seaxe (Saxons) 21:04:57 So, Sexual would mean ``Regarding the Saxons'' ? 21:05:27 Careful! That conclusion's slippery, don't jump on it! 21:05:30 Wessex too (west), but is there a Nossex? ;) 21:05:50 Midd*le(se)*x 21:06:07 Wessex no longer exists :-P 21:06:13 GreyKnight: But the scots originally came from Ireland. So if you're Irish but originally came from Scotland, then you're Irish but originally-originally came from Ireland :P 21:06:23 What about susessex? 21:06:30 * GreyKnight head asplode 21:06:47 susessex is quite asplodey indeed. 21:07:12 Well, looking at the archaic notation for vectors in physics, this way is more entertaining and just as obfuscating. 21:07:33 30 degrees Susessex! 21:09:18 You think archaic vector notations are strange? Look at tensors. Your head will asplode. 21:19:25 -!- Sgeo has quit ("Ex-Chat"). 21:23:28 -!- Sgeo has joined. 21:38:48 I'm trying to figure out a regexpy way of replacing "foo" with "$foo". 21:38:51 Nobody's in ##quantum. 21:38:57 pikhq: s/foo/$foo/? 21:39:04 I had a quantum question... 21:39:11 ihope: That doesn't work quite so well in Tcl regexps. 21:39:20 Really? 21:39:26 -!- jix has quit ("Bitte waehlen Sie eine Beerdigungnachricht"). 21:39:27 s/foo/\%foo/, then? 21:39:49 Erm s/foo/\$foo/ 21:40:18 regsub {regexp to be matched} {string to do substitution in} {what to replace with} 21:41:42 quantum question? 21:42:27 Hmm... 21:42:40 I think Heisenberg has me. 21:42:43 Maybe I should just call sed. :p 21:44:56 "A just policy is one which you would accept without knowing which side of it you'd be on." 21:45:07 Taxes are unjust, then. 21:45:59 Not to say that they aren't... 21:46:05 tax money doesn't just disappear into the ether, though 21:46:20 they're supposed to be used to provide useful national services and whatnot 21:46:43 I disturbs me that I had to include "supposed to" on that 21:58:29 !help 21:58:32 help ps kill i eof flush show ls bf_txtgen usertrig daemon undaemon 21:58:34 1l 2l adjust axo bch bf{8,[16],32,64} funge93 fyb fybs glass glypho kipple lambda lazyk linguine malbolge pbrain qbf rail rhotor sadol sceql trigger udage01 unlambda whirl 21:59:19 !bf_txtgen !quine 21:59:36 76 +++++++++++[>+++>++++++++++>><<<<-]>.>+++.++++.------------.+++++.---------. [402] 22:00:41 Mmh, eh. 22:06:54 -!- ihope_ has joined. 22:09:00 -!- calamari has quit ("Leaving"). 22:23:49 -!- ihope has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 22:24:24 -!- marinus has quit (Remote closed the connection). 22:37:47 -!- tgwizard has quit (Connection timed out). 22:52:10 -!- anonfunc has quit. 22:55:28 I demand GregorR. 22:55:32 Where is he?!?! 22:55:42 * RodgerTheGreat shrugs 22:55:53 What do you want him for? 22:57:40 I need to know what RawIRC can (or more aptly, cannot) do. 22:57:59 Why? 22:58:12 So I can port it. 22:59:11 I think RawIRC = TCP client + IRC syntax highlighting + display of undisplayable characters + entry of untypable characters. 22:59:46 :P 23:00:30 And remember that MemoServ + pastebin = email :-) 23:00:54 Except that everyone can see your email. 23:01:13 Everyone can see Pastebin too. 23:01:36 And that's why everyone can see your email. 23:01:41 You have to stick it in a pastebin. 23:01:52 Exactly. 23:04:35 I've got the macro system working. 23:05:03 So email GregorR your question :-) 23:05:12 * pikhq much abused Tcl to do so 23:05:56 Zomg 23:06:27 YOU'RE HERE! 23:06:33 * ihope_ kisses Gr--wait, what? 23:06:39 zomg again 23:07:04 telnet + coloring + macros + auto-ping-pong + auto-jon/auto-identify 23:07:22 It does not give you typability of untypable characters, that's provided by ^(whatever) already 23:07:32 Oh, plus it carries the line you're typing. 23:07:53 So you can press control-C and it'll just type that character? 23:08:03 No, ^C will kill it :P 23:08:06 ^A will give you \1 though 23:08:15 That means itstehsuckulose 23:10:23 Coloring?! 23:10:31 Heww yeah 23:10:32 What hell?! 23:10:40 http://www.codu.org/rawirc.png 23:10:50 What happens if some guy on IRC says ANSI terminal control codes? 23:11:02 Hahaha :P. 23:11:06 ihope_: Anything unprintable is converted to a . 23:11:24 Are the dots color-coded or anything? 23:11:28 Nope. 23:11:33 Of course not. Pshhh. 23:12:09 That means it sucks random things and you fail at life. 23:12:13 :-P 23:12:46 Does it still do the annoying line echoing? 23:13:28 I am victorious! 23:13:34 No you're not. 23:13:48 GregorR loses, but that doesn't mean you win. 23:15:04 I'll bet he's furiously coding the feature to get rid of nonprintable characters right now. 23:15:21 Razor-X: No. 23:15:22 Let's spam him with ASCII control characters! 23:15:24 * pikhq is victorious, because he has his macro system working 23:28:23 -!- kipple_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 23:40:05 * pikhq has combined the two-stage compiling thing into a single stage. :D 23:48:21 -!- GreyKnight has quit ("."). 23:49:16 "." isn't a quit message! 23:49:49 It's... it's... 23:49:52 ...an alligator!