00:11:17 Hmmm... okay. 00:11:23 I present ye all with a challenge. 00:11:29 A collaborative challenge. 00:11:35 Simulate brainfuck with wikisyntax. 00:11:49 I feel like proving wikisyntax is turing complete. 00:13:13 we need some sort of reward for these challenges >:-( 00:14:09 It'd be really shoddy... but I'm thinking we could use a {{BFarray}} template that contains a bunch of if templates... each one checking a number... if the parameter of the template equals a number in one of the ifs... then the BFarray template will return something. 00:14:46 but... how would you alter the returned templates any deeper? 00:15:30 I feel like wiki syntax is probably not TC. 00:15:53 I think it's possible... just... insanely difficult. 00:16:22 It has control flow... something similar to variables... and returnable functions that intake parameters... so.... it's pretty close. 00:17:01 Looking at semi-Thue systems might be instructive if you're looking into this 00:17:16 ISTM there's some connection between the two 00:18:40 Recursion/iteration? 00:19:12 well, the whole idea of computing by replacing strings with each other 00:19:40 I was actually asking CakeProphet if there's recursion or iteration :P 00:20:02 ...I knew that! 00:20:30 Well... wikimedia software purposely blocks infinite loops to prevent.. uh... well.. 00:20:31 you know. 00:20:34 infinite loops. 00:21:00 iteration... don't think so... but given the tools you have you -might- be able to create iteration... somehow... 00:21:04 Well, you're only interested in the language, not the implementation 00:21:31 The software prevents infinite loops... but otherwise I'd say it's possible to do recursion. 00:22:07 If they can make an if template out of scratch... I'm guessing iteration is possible too. 00:23:30 -!- CXI has quit (Connection timed out). 00:24:15 It can also except input... in the form of the code... which could be used to alter templates... which are going to be the building blocks of any sort of TC wikisyntax. 00:43:25 -!- pikhq_ has joined. 00:50:29 -!- CakeProphet has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 00:51:57 -!- pikhq has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 00:52:36 -!- CakeProphet has joined. 00:54:57 -!- pikhq_ has changed nick to pikhq. 01:25:46 -!- CXI has joined. 02:16:22 -!- pikhq has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)). 02:16:32 -!- pikhq has joined. 02:16:45 * GreyKnight trips over pikhq's corpse as it comes back to life 02:55:36 I hate Wiki markup, so I'd rather prove TeX is turing complete... but that's trivial to prove :P. 02:56:36 Do I get a reward for implementing the Ackermann function in Scheme, CakeProphet ? 02:56:43 And the entire 1.5 minutes I spend on it? 02:57:01 ......no 02:57:08 Aww man. 02:57:19 But, because of that, I feel like plotting this function on a 3D graph. 02:57:42 * GreyKnight gives Razor-X a tasty bun as a prize 02:57:53 Yay! IRC tasty bun! 02:58:29 * GreyKnight gives up trying to draw an ASCII bun 02:59:05 Did you enter the competition, by the way? 02:59:15 >.> 03:00:19 Wha? 03:00:39 .,. 03:01:26 Wha? 03:02:02 ?ahW 03:02:28 Yes. 03:02:49 'W\'h\'a\'?\ 03:03:29 #\W#\ #\h#\ #\a#\?#\! 03:14:48 -!- ivan` has joined. 03:19:45 -!- CakeProphet has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 03:20:05 -!- CakeProphet has joined. 03:28:57 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 04:12:10 (defun ackermann (a b) (cond ((= a 0) (1+ b)) ((and (> a 0)(= b 0)) (ackermann (1- a) 1)) ((and (> a 0)(> b 0)) (ackermann (1- a) (ackermann a (1- b)))) )) 04:25:03 -!- Arrogant has joined. 04:36:03 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 04:36:11 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 04:54:46 -!- Arrogant_ has joined. 05:01:32 -!- Arrogant has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 05:09:17 Night all. 05:09:31 -!- Sgeo has quit ("Ex-Chat"). 05:19:28 -!- CakeProphet has quit (No route to host). 05:25:05 -!- cmeme has quit (Remote closed the connection). 05:25:47 -!- cmeme has joined. 05:27:05 What if I feed it a non-integer? 05:27:13 *Burn*. 05:29:12 Well, non-integers don't exist in the language yet :-P 05:29:34 well, non-integral numbers, I mean 05:29:34 Wow. Sounds mighty useful :P. 05:29:45 Time to stare at more ABNF goodness. 05:30:03 ABNF: It's What's For Dinner 05:31:07 Ah, here's the distinguishing point between servername and the alternative. 05:31:19 It's funny, because x / y isn't technically part of the ABNF standard, but it's used everywhere. 05:31:34 EABNF? :-P 05:31:42 E? 05:31:49 Extended 05:31:57 -_-'' 05:32:07 MEABNF we'll have soon enough. 05:32:31 SHDMEABNFWXYZ-andapartridgeinapeartree 05:32:52 ;D. 05:34:53 Uggh. Parsers :P 05:34:54 . 05:35:13 Hm... I am going to have to make setf places work properly before I can put in decent hash tables 05:35:20 But after I write the parser, things should go easier from there, and maybe I'll ease my conscience enough to write a program that plots the Ackermann function. 05:35:54 I don't think Ackermann will look very interesting as a graph :-P 05:36:05 I think it would look pretty whacky. 05:36:49 Of course, both a and b would have to be graphed only on intervals of [1, 5] :D. 05:37:07 Well, x will be [0, 5]. 05:37:13 Anything more will take ages to evaluate. 05:37:14 and interpolated between, unless you know how to extend it to real numbers 05:37:41 Well, it's a graph, I'm not trying to prove a theorem through induction. 05:37:45 :-P 05:38:39 Just pointing out that a collection of 25 points mightn't be very fascinating without an interpolated surface between them 05:39:14 It's monotonic in both arguments, though, so no pretty features :-( 05:39:48 Heh. True. 05:40:04 Just a sheet that suddenly shoots off vertically 05:41:31 * GreyKnight leaves for sleep 05:41:55 -!- GreyKnight has quit ("Sleeps?"). 05:42:33 -!- NetCat has joined. 05:42:44 * Razor-X eats something. 05:43:36 Hmmmm. Does any IRC server omit the prefix? 05:44:34 Omit what prefix/ 05:44:38 ? 05:47:17 The IRC prefix. 05:49:40 If you mean the ":foo" part of the message, it's legal to omit it, so you should allow for that, no matter what current servers do. 05:50:18 Yeah, I thought so. 05:55:12 Nearly got my GNU/Linux system set up on my Mac LC580 8-D 06:00:09 I used to run GNU/Linux on a Performa 5200, but that's a few orders of magnitude more normal; it's a ppc box, not a 68k one. (Although it's also a very silly box: http://www.lowendmac.com/roadapples/x200.shtml ) 06:02:03 -!- CXI has quit (Connection timed out). 06:03:44 Mine was probably a road apple too. 06:03:52 But I replaced the proc. 06:16:24 Incredible, FreeNode's ping timeout is just incredible. 06:16:53 I was gone for 30 minutes, and the PING request wasn't ponged and it's still alive :D. 07:22:48 -!- RodgerTheGreat has quit. 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:03:32 -!- GregorR-W has quit (Remote closed the connection). 08:04:23 -!- GregorR-W has joined. 08:14:12 -!- Arrogant_ has changed nick to Arrogant. 10:11:39 I've received a spam with this plaintext content: 10:11:42 ook Of 10:11:42 ook 10:11:42 ook Of 10:11:42 ook Of 10:11:42 ook 10:11:43 Of 10:11:47 Of 10:11:49 ook Of 10:12:29 made me wonder if it is a short program written in a variant of Ook! 10:19:03 -!- nickie12 has joined. 10:19:15 hello? 10:19:57 hello? 10:20:06 ^^ 10:20:12 :D 10:27:00 -!- nickie12 has quit. 10:32:01 -!- nickie12 has joined. 10:39:11 -!- NetCat has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 10:45:37 -!- Arrogant has quit ("Leaving"). 10:48:11 -!- Sph1nx has joined. 11:11:01 -!- nickie12 has quit. 12:09:10 -!- Sph1nx has quit ("До свидания всем!"). 12:31:14 -!- Sgeo has joined. 12:43:27 BBl 13:16:08 -!- jix has joined. 14:13:44 * pikhq yodels 17:18:13 -!- kipple_ has joined. 17:53:11 -!- _jol_ has joined. 18:04:37 -!- jix has quit ("Bitte waehlen Sie eine Beerdigungnachricht"). 18:05:06 -!- tgwizard has joined. 18:22:40 -!- ihope_ has joined. 18:33:14 -!- _jol_ has quit ("my keyb oard seems t o bee b ro ken :-("). 18:34:05 -!- ihope_ has changed nick to ihope. 18:42:54 -!- _jol_ has joined. 19:00:12 -!- _jol_ has quit ("leaving"). 19:53:55 -!- _jol_ has joined. 20:40:14 So it's Python, Perl, PHP, and Ruby? 20:40:35 what is? 20:40:45 The P languages. 20:41:20 is there a language called Puny yet? if not, i might have to make one... 20:41:50 Nope. 20:46:45 it would of course be weakly typed 20:49:14 Weakly typed but with static typing? 20:49:41 And you'd have to give types for everything, but the types wouldn't do anything? 20:52:36 -!- jix has joined. 21:02:54 -!- CakeProphet has joined. 21:07:34 -!- _jol_ has quit ("temci lo nu sipna .i co'o"). 21:35:32 -!- fuse has joined. 21:36:52 -!- CakeProphet has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 21:36:52 -!- ivan` has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 21:37:43 -!- ivan` has joined. 21:37:57 -!- CakeProphet has joined. 22:06:21 Selling cake for more than you buy it for = prophet? 22:06:23 :-P 22:26:24 -!- jix has quit ("Bitte waehlen Sie eine Beerdigungnachricht"). 22:50:07 ? 22:50:23 Bad pun. 22:50:30 Profit = prophet, aye? 23:07:03 -!- fuse has quit ("g'night all"). 23:12:24 -!- GreyKnight has joined. 23:40:41 -!- alex89ru has joined. 23:40:57 Hi @ all 23:41:10 hello 23:41:19 Has anyone of you already writtem your own esoteric language? 23:41:26 maybe an interpreted language? 23:41:46 yes, many of us have 23:42:04 good 23:42:07 I'd go so far as to say /most/ of us. 23:42:11 and what abou you 23:42:14 +t 23:42:18 okay :) 23:43:19 are most of this languages interpreted or comnpiled? 23:43:23 compiled 23:43:36 or oth? 23:43:41 Probably slightly more are interpreted, but many are both. 23:43:45 I guess most of them are interpreted 23:44:36 kipple_ , GregorR have specialy YOU written some esoteric languages too? If so, have you published these? 23:44:40 so, have you made any esoteric languages then? 23:44:46 no 23:44:51 I have written Kipple ... 23:44:59 lol :) 23:45:01 I've written several. 23:45:02 link? 23:45:13 http://www.esolangs.org/wiki/Gregor_Richards 23:45:19 thx 23:45:19 http://rune.krokodille.com/lang/kipple/ 23:45:28 thx 23:45:36 I' 23:45:47 http://esolangs.org/wiki/Main_Page is really the place to go 23:45:54 ok 23:46:03 if you're after esolangs 23:46:31 yes i am 23:49:19 time to sleep. gn all 23:51:44 Is it hard to develop one esoteric language? ( I assume, that it is not hard for interpreted esoteric languages, but maybe I'm wrong??? )