←2003-01-20 2003-01-21 2003-01-22→ ↑2003 ↑all
02:03:59 -!- Taaus has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)).
02:04:19 -!- Taaus has joined.
03:08:42 -!- lament has joined.
07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended).
08:00:00 -!- clog has joined.
09:36:38 -!- dbc1 has joined.
09:36:48 <dbc1> nick dbc
09:49:42 -!- dbc1 has changed nick to dbc.
09:53:38 <dbc> *
09:53:38 <dbc> * *
09:53:38 <dbc> * *
09:53:38 <dbc> * * * *
09:53:38 <dbc> * *
09:53:38 <dbc> * * * *
09:53:38 -!- dbc has quit (Excess Flood).
09:53:57 -!- dbc has joined.
09:54:44 <lament> o_O
09:55:07 <dbc> Oh well.
09:55:20 <dbc> Just trying to make things a little more interesting. Think it'll work if I do it more slowly?
09:55:55 <dbc> Well, may as well try. Please don't interrupt.
09:56:05 <dbc> *
09:56:05 <dbc> * *
09:56:05 <dbc> * *
09:56:05 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:14 <dbc> * *
09:56:14 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:14 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:14 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:22 <dbc> * *
09:56:22 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:22 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:22 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:32 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:33 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:33 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:33 <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
09:56:41 <dbc> * *
09:56:42 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:42 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:42 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:49 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:49 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:49 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:49 <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
09:56:57 <dbc> * * * *
09:56:57 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:57 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:56:57 <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
09:57:05 <dbc> * * * * * * * *
09:57:05 <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
09:57:05 <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
09:57:05 <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
09:57:13 <dbc>
09:57:30 <dbc> Okay.
09:57:50 <fizzie> mm'k.
09:57:50 <lament> yay.
09:59:01 <fizzie> printed with a befunge prog or something? I recall seeing a sierpinski-triangle-printer once.
10:09:59 <dbc> That one is NYYRIKKI's brainfuck version.
10:12:04 <fizzie> ah, re befunge, just wrote an interpreter with forth. so our unofficial befunge-interpreters-in-obsolete-but-non-esoteric-languages project now has forth, fortran-77, algol-60, plus few less interesting ones. maybe should do cobol next.
10:12:47 <dbc> I've just translated a much less well-known fractal though. Again please don't interrupt...(and sorry for monopolizing the channel...this should be the last...)
10:13:12 <lament> fizzie: go to #forth and say it's obsolete, i dare you
10:13:13 <dbc> ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
10:13:13 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:13 <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
10:13:13 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:15 <dbc> ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
10:13:16 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:16 <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
10:13:17 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:21 <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ## ## ###
10:13:21 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:23 <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ###
10:13:25 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:29 <dbc> ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ###
10:13:32 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:33 <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ### ## # ##
10:13:35 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:37 <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## # ##
10:13:39 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:41 <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ###
10:13:43 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:45 <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ## # ## ## ## ## ## ### ### ###
10:13:47 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:49 <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## # ## ###
10:13:51 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:54 <dbc> ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ###
10:13:55 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:13:57 <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ## # ## ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ##
10:13:59 <dbc> # # # # # # # #
10:14:01 <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ##
10:14:03 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:05 <dbc> ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ###
10:14:07 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:09 <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ###
10:14:11 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:13 <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
10:14:15 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:19 <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
10:14:21 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:23 <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ###
10:14:25 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:27 <dbc> ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ###
10:14:29 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:31 <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ##
10:14:33 <dbc> # # # # # # # #
10:14:35 <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ## # ## ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ##
10:14:37 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:39 <dbc> ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ###
10:14:41 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:43 <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## # ## ###
10:14:45 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:47 <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ## # ## ## ## ## ## ### ### ###
10:14:49 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:51 <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ###
10:14:53 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:14:55 <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## # ##
10:14:57 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:15:05 <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ### ## # ##
10:15:07 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:15:09 <dbc> ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ###
10:15:11 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:15:13 <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ###
10:15:15 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # #
10:15:17 <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ## ## ###
10:15:19 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:15:21 <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
10:15:23 <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
10:15:25 <dbc> ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
10:15:27 <dbc>
10:15:29 <dbc> Okay.
10:17:58 <dbc> (Actually that probably needs, at the least, a change of font to look good...)
10:18:31 <lament> font?
10:18:37 <lament> you don't know what font i'm using :)
10:19:14 <dbc> Are you using one as wide as it is high?
10:19:24 <lament> no.
10:19:57 <lament> what fractal is that, anyway?
10:20:02 <dbc> I had suspected not. People don't usually. Still I left the "probably" there as a weasel word.
10:20:46 <dbc> That's the result of a Fredkin rule cellular automaton (one that sets each cell to the parity of its neighbors)...
10:21:34 <lament> how's it a fractal?
10:21:40 <dbc> eight neighbors, starting condition only one cell turned on...this is I think after 32 iterations.
10:22:19 <lament> hm, there doesn't seem to be a mandelbrot generator in brainfuck
10:22:22 <lament> i should fix that
10:23:18 <dbc> Well, it can also be constructed like the koch snowflake etc, by repeatedly replacing a certain pattern of lines with another one...
10:23:34 <dbc> though the parts come out at different speeds with that method.
10:32:28 <dbc> Good luck on that project, anyway...
10:34:04 <lament> it should be easy
10:34:07 <lament> or maybe not
10:38:47 <lament> besides, i have a magic brainfuck preprocessor
10:38:54 <dbc> Oh christ.
10:40:28 <lament> all i need is a good representation for fractional numbers.
10:43:58 <lament> hahahahahaa
10:44:06 <lament> i searched google for 'imaginary numbers'
10:44:21 <lament> the very first result is some page in the university of toronto
10:44:27 <lament> 'Do "Imaginary Numbers" Really Exist?'
10:44:39 <lament> and they give a long answer to that
10:44:48 <lament> which includes "Imaginary numbers do exist."
10:45:04 <lament> Jesus christ, it's the leading canadian university
10:45:12 <lament> And they're saying imaginary numbers exist :\
10:46:00 <lament> and they're using an extremely broken argument to prove their 'existance'
11:00:42 <dbc> I'm not sure the question is even well-defined.
11:01:29 <lament> I would be terrified to find out numbers actually existed.
11:01:41 <dbc> Why? They don't have teeth.
11:01:51 <lament> dbc: only because they don't exist!
11:01:57 <dbc> :)
11:02:53 <lament> Stupid fractional numbers.
11:03:29 <dbc> You can keep them as numerator and denominator, no?
11:03:31 <lament> They don't exist either, but they sure are stupid.
11:03:50 <lament> I can, I guess.
11:04:44 <lament> problematic on 8-bit brainfuck machines.
11:05:15 <dbc> well, you can keep both numerator and denominator as strings of binary or decimal digits, one per cell. Probably faster anyway.
11:06:17 <lament> I think I just suck at brainfuck.
11:07:25 <dbc> Oh. That would be unfortunate.
11:07:45 <dbc> Does brainfuck exist?
11:09:15 <lament> no, but it seems to have teeth anyway.
11:13:36 <dbc> *8)#
11:13:59 <lament> that looks like a Dr. Seuss character.
11:14:25 <dbc> Self-portrait. There's another on my web page now.
11:15:10 <lament> You look like a Dr. Seuss character? Cool
11:15:39 <dbc> (which is the 22nd google response for "brainfuck")
11:16:28 <dbc> (must depart)
11:16:31 <dbc> (see you)
11:18:08 <lament> goodbye.
11:23:29 <fizzie> according to googlism, 'brainfuck is not sexy', 'brainfuck is the ultimate sexual experience', 'brainfuck is too obviously evil', 'brainfuck is too obviously evil' and 'brainfuck is now'.
11:23:51 <lament> googlism?
11:28:10 <fizzie> googlism.com, which has recently acquired annoying popups. you give it a word or two, and it searches google and returns 'foo is bar'-style sentences.
11:28:40 <fizzie> according to googlism, I personally am "60 mm in diameter and each weighs over 5 oz"
11:32:34 <lament> Amazing.
11:32:36 <lament> "lament is the cheat and a dirty bastard"
11:33:09 <lament> "lament is that we put undergraduates through three years of lecture"
11:33:37 <lament> "brainfuck is better than"
11:33:43 <lament> heh.
11:58:51 <dbc> Have a look at the responses for "bush".
11:59:09 <lament> hmm, i can imagine
11:59:28 <dbc> bush is engaged in feverish diplomacy to stop an india
11:59:40 <dbc> bush is glad
12:00:11 <lament> I like how the first 4 responses are inflammatory.
12:00:49 <dbc> bush is the
12:01:08 <lament> "bush is also a member of the illuminist"
12:01:22 <lament> "bush is winning god still blesses america
12:01:22 <lament> "
12:01:44 <lament> "bush is doomed to fail if he doesn't cut off financing of terrorists"
12:02:53 <dbc> I like the ones that aren't complete sentences best :/
12:06:10 <dbc> "googlism is"
12:06:19 <dbc> "googlism is working now"
12:06:24 <dbc> (that's the complete list)
12:06:27 <lament> heh.
13:46:08 <Taaus> I'm negative, apparently... :o
13:46:18 <Taaus> 'taus is less than 0'
13:46:20 <lament> yes you are!
13:46:56 <Taaus> 'taus is my favorite actress and singer' o_O
13:48:55 <lament> O_o
13:49:11 -!- lament has set topic: esoteric cheese and programming languages, logs at http://www.tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric/.
13:49:37 <lament> 'esoteric cheese' sounds better than 'esoteric programming'.
15:53:12 -!- clog has quit (^C).
15:53:12 -!- clog has quit (ended).
15:54:06 -!- clog has joined.
15:54:06 -!- clog has joined.
16:19:06 -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face").
21:25:38 <exarkun> This is the boringest channel evar
21:25:58 -!- exarkun has left (?).
22:43:02 <dbc> I've seen worse.
←2003-01-20 2003-01-21 2003-01-22→ ↑2003 ↑all