User talk:Billlam

Revolver Architect
I'm pretty sure command 1 for Revolver Architect is redundant, as it is exactly the same as 0. Taneb 14:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand the point of this Revolver Architect thing; you say it's for simplification and ease of use, yet not only do users still have to remember every command, but now their positions on the wheel, and the current wheel pointer, as well. It doesn't look very good as a compression technique, either. --monqy 16:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

It seems like your Revolver Architect is simply a way of turning any OCPC (one character per command) language into a turning tarpit. —Maharba 17:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)