Talk:Poison

I don't think this is the generally accepted way of writing wiki articles. Furthermore, this is arguably not an esoteric programming language and can consequently be considered as spam.--AnotherTest (talk) 09:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * FURscript is arguably precedent to keep stuff like this. ehird (talk) 14:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * On the first point, at the risk of being pedantic, per the disclaimer that comes up anytime you edit anything on this wiki, the article is subject to being edited "mercilessly" to make it conform to the generally accepted way of writing wiki articles -- so that's probably not worth discussing. However... judging by the staleness of the FURscript article, it also seems that people would simply rather not touch articles like these, perhaps? Chris Pressey (talk) 16:56, 4 November 2012 (UTC)